Blame - who is at fault? I'm obsessing sorry in advance
I suffered with my primary total hip replacement for 19 months before it was revised. I retained the parts. What I saw was both rotational and rocking wear on the liner. Surgical notes said there was a significant amount green-black fluid between the cup and the metal liner. From what Dr. Google says and my surgeon, and my PA, the only way for the liner to disassociate from the shell is through a traumatic event, or the liner never have been seated correctly during surgery.
I found a Stryker document that in my mind acknowledges that there is a issue with proper seating of the liner https://www.stryker.com/content/dam/stryker/no-index/training-and-education/jr45/season-3/march/resources/MDM_Surgical_protocol_JR_GSNPS_SURGP_1003536_EN_US.pdf page 14 in text under the caution in the box.
So Sryker in my mind has said this is a know problem, look out. So is Styker at fault for creating a joint that is difficult to install correctly in surgery, or is it surgical error and was my doctor just being careless in surgery?
At the end of the day I had a failed hip due to metallosis, I lost my job because of my ongoing pain and from what I now realize was cobalt poisoning. I am amazed at how fast post op the symptoms of the constant headaches, nausea, itching, changes in vision, ability to speak, ability to think have improved. One of my friends was telling me about the Iron Man 2 and Palladium Poisoning
While Metal Man (2008) ignores metal toxicity, Iron Man 2 (2010) centers its plot around palladium poisoning.
My friend said my face looked like the Iron man character's makeup - he was surprised at how accurately the movie created the look of metal poisoning - which he saw in my face.
Thoughts - again I know I obsessing, but I think most people would want to know why a really bad thing happened to them. Thank you for your kindness