u/Substantial_Bag_8066

McCaskey/Warren in Hammond Yesterday; HB910 Likely to Pass House Next Week... The Outcome Remains Hammond — Updates Coming Fast

Two things are going to happen that will confuse a lot of people over the next ten days.

First: Kevin Warren and George McCaskey drove to Hammond today and spent hours going through what the mayor called "hundreds of due diligence items" at the proposed stadium site — on the same day the Illinois House adjourned without a floor vote, missing the crossover deadline to send the bill to the Senate. The Bears issued an official statement using the word "commitment" to describe their work in Hammond.

Second: HB910 — the megaprojects bill — will probably pass the Illinois House next week. Kam Buckner has been the most confident he's sounded in months. David Kaplan tweeted yesterday morning that he's more convinced than ever the Bears are going to Arlington Heights and expects a bipartisan vote in the next ten days. I think he's right about the vote. He's wrong about what it means.

Both things can be true simultaneously. Here's why.

What Happened In Hammond Today

The Northwest Indiana Times had exclusive access. Kevin Warren and George McCaskey — not lawyers, not staff (they were there too) — the chairman and the president/CEO of the Chicago Bears were photographed walking out of Lost Marsh Golf Club together with Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr. after what McDermott called "the first one on-site that we've had with everybody present at the table."

The Bears' official statement: they "continue to work together with Indiana leaders on our commitment to finish the necessary due diligence work for the Hammond site."

The word is commitment. Communications teams don't accidentally use that word.

McDermott said they discussed "hundreds of different things." Think about what hundreds of items means for a moment. You don't review hundreds of items on a site you're exploring. You review hundreds of items when you're in pre-construction planning — utility routing, parcel sequencing, access points, construction phasing, environmental remediation specifics. That's not due diligence on whether to go. That's due diligence on how to build.

Scott Miller — Hammond's Chief of Staff, who was in the room — went on Facebook six hours after the meeting and wrote: "I was fortunate enough to attend this meeting today and I'll just say the future is bright for Hammond and the Region!" with a flexing emoji.

The Chicago Sun-Times beat reporter Patrick Finley, who covers the Bears daily and has organizational sources, called it "a public salvo." His word, not mine.

George McCaskey, whose family has owned this franchise since his grandfather bought it in 1920 for $100, was physically on the proposed stadium site in Indiana working through hundreds of operational details the day his home state legislature left town without passing his bill.

Watch what people do. Not what they say.

Why HB910 Will Probably Pass The House Next Week

Buckner has been working on this for three and a half years. He's not stupid and he's not lying — though he is a politician. When he says "punch list," "next week is a big week," and "good news very soon," he believes it and he wants to deliver it.

The AFP provision — the language that lets local governments count frozen property assessments at full market value when calculating levy limits and bonding capacity, shifting the resulting tax burden onto surrounding homeowners — will probably come out of the bill. It was originally in there to give local taxing bodies a financial incentive to sign PILOT agreements in the first place. The problem is the same language that made local governments willing to participate is the same language that makes homeowners near Arlington Heights pay higher bills for a tax break the Bears receive. AFP correctly identified this as a structural poison pill and mobilized against it. Taking it out resolves the Republican objection and the AFP mobilization simultaneously — and Buckner needs both.

The smaller investment tiers — the $100M and $250M thresholds that allowed smaller projects to qualify — will probably go too, leaving only the $500M floor. Cleaner bill, harder to attack.

Watch for amendment language filed Monday or Tuesday. Watch for a floor vote Tuesday through Thursday — the only three legislative days before a one-week recess. Watch for it to pass somewhere between 60 and 70 votes with a handful of Republicans.

Kaplan is probably right. He's just wrong about what the vote means.

Why Passing The House Doesn't Matter

Here's what everyone celebrating a House vote will miss.

HB910 missed the April 18 crossover deadline. That means it can't move through the Senate as a normal House bill. To get it to the Senate now, Buckner needs to use a shell bill — a piece of legislation already in the Senate that gets gutted and replaced with the megaprojects language. That requires Don Harmon, the Senate President, to actively want this to happen.

Harmon's office, when asked about the Bears situation throughout this process, said the Senate's focus is "education and health care and everyday affordability." He has been as publicly unenthusiastic as Welch from the beginning. Harmon controls the Senate Assignments Committee — the place late bills go to die if the Senate President doesn't want them moving. If the bill arrives in the Senate next Thursday with freshly amended language that senators haven't had time to review, Harmon has every reason to let it sit in Assignments through the recess.

So the most likely sequence is: House passes it. Senate doesn't act before recess. House and Senate both come back May 5. The Bears announce Hammond on May 1.

But even if by some combination of miracles the Senate moves fast and passes it before recess — the Bears still face this sequence before they have anything approaching a deal:

Negotiate the actual PILOT rate with Arlington Heights taxing bodies — school districts, park districts, municipalities, each with their own lawyers and no incentive to move quickly for a team that's been trying to leave. Secure the infrastructure funding — $734 million in roads, sewers, and transit — for which HB910 has no mechanism whatsoever. Concluded agreements with every relevant taxing body giving them the property tax certainty they said was mandatory from the start.

That process takes months under ideal conditions. These are not ideal conditions. These are taxing bodies in an election year who know they have maximum leverage over a franchise trying to exit.

Indiana's equivalent of all of this is already done. In statute. The Stadium Authority is constituted. The bond mechanism is established. The toll road renegotiation locked in $700 million for infrastructure. Tax rates are set in law, not subject to negotiation. The Bears sign a lease with an authority that already exists and is already funded. They may be waiting on the Fertitta Ceasars bid to conclude still... but that's not a state issue.

Here is the unavoidable math: The NFL spring owners meeting is May 19-20 in Orlando. If the Bears don't have a package ready to present there, the next opportunity for a formal ownership vote is October. The Bears are not missing Orlando. There is no version of an Arlington Heights deal that is presentable in Orlando by May 19. Even if the bill passes both chambers this week, the downstream negotiations required to produce actual property tax certainty would take until fall at the absolute earliest. Miss Orlando and it goes to October. The Bears will not let that happen.

The Script, Filled In

Here's how the next three weeks play out.

Buckner files his amendment, gets his House vote, takes a bow. If the Senate stalls — likely — he still delivered the House. He was on the punch list. He was working. He talked to Kevin Warren every morning. He nearly did it. That's a serviceable legacy and it gives every Illinois Democrat the cover they need.

The press covers the April 29 NFL Stadium Committee meeting where Kevin Warren briefs ownership on Bears stadium progress. Leaks begin surfacing that Hammond is the site.

Pritzker issues a statement: the scaffolding was there, the House delivered, the Bears chose a business timeline over a legislative one. He tried. It's in the record.

Welch says approximately nothing. Two paragraphs, platitudes, moves on. His district isn't losing anything and he was never invested.

Harmon notes it's unfair to blame the Senate, which received a bill with newly amended language and insufficient time to review it before recess. He's not wrong technically, which is exactly why this outcome serves him.

Brandon Johnson is loudest. Billionaires over community. A century of legacy abandoned for tax incentives. This plays well with his base and costs him nothing since the Bears were never coming to the city anyway.

Goodell already pre-authorized the Bears' exit framing. Every time he said "sooner rather than later" at the owners meetings he was handing the Bears a script line. The Bears' announcement cites the NFL's institutional timeline, the Stadium Committee's April 29 meeting, and the Orlando ownership vote as reasons they could not wait for a legislative process with no guaranteed completion date.

The Bears announce Hammond on or around May 1 with full Wolf Lake renderings, emphasize they're staying in Chicagoland within their defined NFL market territory — the same statute the Giants and Jets have played in since 1976 — thank Illinois and Buckner by name, cite NFL timeline requirements, and pivot to the excitement of what gets built.

Jim Tinaglia reminds everyone he warned the process was moving too slowly and assures Arlington Heights that their 326 acres will be developed.

Two immediate questions need answers. What happens to the Arlington Heights land — the Bears call it a future mixed-use development opportunity they're committed to making valuable for the community. What about the Soldier Field lease — "we will honor our commitments to the city" while lawyers negotiate the exit payment behind closed doors.

Why Friday May 1

May 1 is a week after the draft ends. The Bears aren't announcing during draft week — too much noise, wrong story, the league would ask them not to. But the post-draft NFL analysis cycle means football content already dominates the conversation the week of April 28, which helps the stadium story land in a media environment already primed for Bears news.

The real reason for a Friday afternoon announcement is simpler. Monday through Thursday announcements give Chicago a full work week of grief, political grandstanding, and media retrospectives before any relief. Five days of angry takes, tearful Soldier Field retrospectives, and Illinois politicians positioning themselves while the McCaskey family absorbs maximum civic punishment with nowhere to hide.

Friday at 3 or 4pm Central, the news breaks. Sports radio goes wall to wall Friday evening. Social media erupts overnight. Saturday morning is raw. By Saturday afternoon the conversation is already moving. The weekend acts as a pressure release valve — the grief lands but doesn't fester through a full news cycle. Next week pivots back to draft picks.

After May 1, Illinois is in recess until May 5. Nothing Springfield can do. No emergency session. No legislative response possible. The recess insulates the announcement completely.

Orlando is May 19-20. Eighteen days between announcement and ratification. Long enough for the news to breathe. Short enough to feel inevitable.

The Thing Nobody Is Talking About

Scott Miller posted a flexing emoji from Hammond today. Kam Buckner expressed confidence and it was picked up everywhere. The Hammond Mayor has been expressing confidence for weeks. His Chief of Staff posted from inside the meeting room and nobody covered it.

The press is playing with your emotions. Buckner's optimism gets 214K views on Twitter. Warren and McCaskey going through hundreds of pre-construction due diligence items at the stadium site gets a brief mention in the Northwest Indiana Times.

One of these things is a politician saying words. The other is the Bears' chairman physically present on the site.

HB910 may well pass the House next week. It's a good show — or worse, useful precedent for a future toxic megaproject that has nothing to do with the Bears.

The Chicago Bears are announcing Hammond, Indiana on or around Friday May 1.

This is the same script I outlined weeks ago with the details now filled in. Illinois needs to look like they tried and ran out of time. The Bears need to look like they had no choice. Every actor is hitting their mark.

Watch what people do. Not what they say.

Previous posts in profile.

reddit.com
u/Substantial_Bag_8066 — 3 days ago

Buckner Claims Arlington is Close- Newly revealed details say it's not. The Bears Present In 12 Days.

Two things happened today that should be read together.

This morning, Capitol News Illinois published a piece titled "Illinois lawmakers claim progress on Bears stadium legislation." This AM, Kam Buckner went on Mully and Haugh and told Chicago that they're at the "punch list" stage, Welch isn't a blocker, and good news is coming in "very short order."

Neither of those things is the same as a floor vote. And the Bears present to the NFL Stadium Committee in 12 days.

Here's what today actually told us.

---

**The Capitol News Illinois Article**

Brenden Moore's piece is worth reading carefully because it's the most detailed public accounting of where the bill actually stands — and it's not as optimistic as the headline suggests.

The summary Moore himself wrote says it plainly: "Illinois lawmakers did not advance property tax legislation this week." That's his lede. His headline says they "claim progress." His own first sentence says otherwise.

What the article confirmed is actually three separate problems that haven't been solved.

The first is Welch's rule. Moore wrote that the Speaker's unofficial requirement that 60 House Democrats support a bill before it gets called "remains in effect" and is "a hurdle to overcome." Present tense. Today. On the day the House adjourned. This is Capitol News Illinois — the outlet closest to Springfield Democrats — confirming the obstacle exists in the same article where Buckner is calling everyone optimistic. Welch is blocking the ability for Republicans to make up the difference, should that negotiation prove fruitful. This confirms Welch is in fact blocking a vote as Ganis claimed.

The second is a structural flaw in the bill itself that AFP spent this week activating against. The provision lets local governments count frozen property assessments at full market value when calculating how much they can tax everyone else. In plain English: the Bears get a tax break, and the school district next door expands its levy as if the Bears were fully taxable, and the homeowners near Arlington Heights absorb the difference. AFP called it the most dangerous property tax idea in state history and mobilized its grassroots network against the exact Republican members Buckner needs.

Here's the catch-22 Buckner is now facing: Moore reported they may remove that language to resolve the political problem. But that language exists because local taxing bodies — school districts, park districts, municipalities — needed the expanded levy capacity as an incentive to sign PILOT agreements with the Bears. Remove it to satisfy AFP and you destroy the reason local governments would negotiate in the first place. Keep it to maintain local government cooperation and AFP burns the coalition down. This is not a punch list item. This is load-bearing.

Moore reveals that to appease nervous lawmakers, they are having to neuter the legislation by raising the threshold to $500 million and slapping a 5-year sunset clause on it so they can "assess the effectiveness of the tool". Even with that, they aren't too 60 Democrats.

The third problem Moore confirmed is the one getting the least attention: Chicago. The article noted that city lawmakers "will likely have to receive something in exchange for their votes." No framework. No offer. No public discussion of what that something is. The Chicago members aren't being difficult — they represent constituents who are losing the Bears from Soldier Field and they need something real to show for their vote. That negotiation has not happened in public and may not have happened at all.

---

**The Buckner Interview**

Buckner called Ganis's Welch claim(that he's the sole person obstructing a deal) "fabrication with confidence" and "a willful mischaracterization." Strong language. He said Welch gave him the green light to bring this home.

Read that carefully. What Buckner described is Welch authorizing him to negotiate. What Buckner did not say is that Welch committed to scheduling a floor vote. A Speaker can greenlight negotiations forever. Those are genuinely different things and Buckner — a lawyer and experienced legislator — chose his words precisely.

He also said next week is a big week. He said good news is coming very short order. He didn't file an amendment. He didn't announce a vote. He didn't name a date.

He did mention, in the same breath as his Bears optimism, that he's simultaneously serving on the House budget negotiation team for a $57 billion state budget. He framed it as "I can walk and chew gum." But Pritzker's statement Thursday told you which one is actually the priority: "We have a lot of things on the schedule that need to get done before the end of May, including a balanced budget." The Bears bill and the state budget are competing for the same legislative oxygen in the same closing weeks of session. Everyone in Springfield knows which one Welch cares about more.

I'm very curious how an already-submitted budget absorbs the 800 million in infrastructure Arlington needs after it's already been made. The entirety of the infrastructure has been ignored, there's no bill. Star bonds are banned for sports team use, there's no way to fund it. If Pritzker says he'll appropriate existing funds to this location he needs to be taken at his word which he can't keep if he leaves office... And financing entities need certainty. It can't be financed.

---

**The Calendar**

The House returns for just three days next week — Tuesday April 21 through Thursday April 23. Then a one-week recess. The House comes back May 5.

The Bears present to the NFL Stadium Committee the morning of April 29. During the recess. The House cannot act.

So the actual window for Illinois to change the Bears' calculus before the committee meeting is three legislative days. Three days to file amendment language, get it reviewed, resolve the AFP provision catch-22, figure out the Chicago concession framework, assemble 60 Democratic votes including members who currently have no reason to vote yes, and get it to the floor. Oh, by the way, the deadline to send bills from the House to the Senate was today.

That is not a punch list. That is starting over.

---

**Meanwhile In Indiana**

The Indiana Finance Authority approved the toll road deal Tuesday — $700 million from ITR Concession Company, structured as $300M within 30 days, $200M within a year, $200M within two years, in exchange for twice-annual toll hikes. State Budget Committee reviewed it Thursday. Every financial component of the Hammond package is now formally approved by the appropriate Indiana government bodies.

The Bears were at the Hammond site Monday. Another visit occurred on site today.

Fertitta's 45-day window to acquire Caesars — which operates Horseshoe Hammond who holds the exclusive casino license in Hammond, adjacent to the stadium site — expires approximately April 28. Caesars releases Q1 earnings after market close April 28 with an investor call at 5pm. VICI Properties, the real estate trust that owns the land under Horseshoe Hammond, reports April 29 and holds its call April 30.

The NFL meeting is the morning of April 29. Caesars earnings are the evening of April 28 so the Bears should know who their development partner in Hammond is by the time they meet with the committee. VICI earnings are April 30. The Fertitta exclusive negotiation window closes April 28.

---

Buckner said punch list. Moore's own article said the obstacles are present tense. Indiana's package is complete. The Bears have three legislative days before the House goes on recess and the NFL meeting happens during that recess, in 12 days.

It begs the question... Is the good news simply the finality of the discussion as the final nails are hammered into Arlington Park's coffin?

---

reddit.com
u/Substantial_Bag_8066 — 4 days ago

[OC] Political Theatre: The Script to Move to Hammond Playing Out (New Public Information From Interviews)

Get ready to downvote this to shoot the messenger again everyone... and complain without making any actual valid counterpoints.

A bit ago I wrote about what I called the theater of the Bears stadium saga: the idea that everyone involved has a role, everyone knows their lines, and what you're watching in the news isn't negotiation. It's choreography. Everyone already knew the Bears were moving to Hamomnd and they were now just going through the motions to manage the public imaging. The curtain is coming down soon and I want to walk through exactly what happened in the last few hours, because if you know what to look for, this is stunning to watch in real time.

Today, Marc Ganis went on Mully and Haugh. Today Pritzker made a statement. These two things happening on the same day are not a coincidence and I'll explain why.

Tomorrow is a political dealdine in Illinois to pass bills from the House to the Senate. The legislature then has a 3-day session next week before taking a one week break.

First, who is Marc Ganis and why does it matter that he's talking?

Ganis is the president of SportsCorp, one of the most connected sports consulting firms in the country. He's been involved in NFL stadium deals for three decades. He was at the NFL league offices in New York on Monday. Not for Bears business specifically (he said it was other business) but he was there when the stadium committee notice went out, and he was told what the agenda was.

When Ganis talks about NFL stadium situations, he's not speculating from the outside. He's characterizing what people inside the process are telling him. He's a proxy for NFL owners. Keep that in mind for everything that follows.

What Ganis actually said, and what it means

The Biggs report Tuesday night said the committee meeting was "the week of April 27." Ganis corrected that this morning with precision: it's the morning of April 29. Single topic. Nothing else on the agenda. Just the Bears stadium.

This distinction matters. A "week of April 27" meeting sounds like a calendar item slotted between other things. A dedicated single-topic morning session on April 29 sounds like something being resolved. Ganis framed it as the owners having watched what's happened in Springfield, or not happened in Springfield, and wanting answers.

He also clarified something about Kevin Warren's "late spring, early summer" timeline that everyone has been misreading. Ganis said he asked Warren directly after that got reported: did you mean that's when you're deciding? Warren said no. That's when everything is done. The decision comes before that. So if you've been thinking the Bears have until May 31 to make up their minds... Ganis directly said the actual decision point is the end of April during this interview.

Then Ganis said the Bears had a site meeting in Indiana on Monday. Have another one scheduled later this week. Multiple days of site activity in Hammond while the Illinois legislature has only three days next week before taking a week break.

The Welch moment

The hosts asked who is blocking the vote in Springfield. Ganis said he's hearing it's one person. One human being preventing a floor vote that he claims would otherwise pass overwhelmingly.

Speaker Chris Welch.

Now Ganis hedged... said he may be wrong, doesn't know Welch personally, could be bad information. But he said it. Publicly. On a major Chicago sports radio program. And he specifically invited the hosts to call Welch and ask him directly.

This is not an accident. You don't name the Speaker of the Illinois House on a radio show unless you're comfortable with the consequences of naming him. And the consequence is exactly what you'd expect: Welch now has a microphone pointed at him. Every political reporter in Springfield will ask him today whether he's blocking the Bears. Whatever he says makes news.

Here's the problem with Ganis's logic though, and I want to flag it because it's a tell. He claimed the votes exist to pass this overwhelmingly. If that were true, why did Brad Stephens need to meet yesterday with Kam Buckner and Andy Manar specifically to find Republican votes? You don't need a bipartisan coalition-building meeting if you already have the votes. Ganis knows the votes don't exist cleanly. He's describing a version of Illinois where Welch is the only obstacle, because that's a cleaner story than "Illinois structurally cannot pass this." He's intentionally creating one person to point to.

Calling out Welch doesn't move his resolve. If anything it hardens it. Welch is not going to see his name on the radio and suddenly schedule a floor vote. Ganis knows this and only says this name if he wishes to sabotage any chance Illinois has at passing something. What calling out Welch does do is establish a named scapegoat for when the Bears announce Hammond. The story becomes: Illinois had the votes. One man blocked it. The Bears had no choice. He's crafting the story for the NFL and Bears to make it easier for fans to accept.

Now read what Pritzker said this morning

Direct quote: "The scaffolding of a deal is there. It's in the hands of state lawmakers. I would like the legislature to move faster, just because I think that will be good for everybody to get this done. We have a lot of things on the schedule that need to get done before the end of May, including a balanced budget."

Let me translate this paragraph by paragraph for anyone who doesn't speak Illinois political.

"The scaffolding of a deal is there" = I supported this. I wanted it done. Don't blame me.

"It's in the hands of state lawmakers" = specifically, it's in the hands of one of them. The one Ganis named this morning. Pritzker is pointing in the same direction without saying the name.

"I would like the legislature to move faster" = this is the mildest pressure a governor can apply to a Speaker of his own party. He's not calling Welch. He's not threatening consequences. He's expressing a preference. To reporters. In public. That is not how you fight for something. That is how you document that you tried.

"We have a lot of things on the schedule that need to get done before the end of May, including a balanced budget" = this is the exit ramp. How do you pass a state budget while simultaneously trying to find $700 million in infrastructure commitments for a stadium? You don't. Pritzker is telling you the budget comes first and the stadium is in competition with it for legislative bandwidth, not a complement to it.

Pritzker also downplayed the Stephens meeting. Said he's not sure why everyone's focused on that particular meeting when conversations have been going on for a while. That's how you talk about a meeting that didn't produce anything. If Stephens had walked out of that room with a deal framework, Pritzker would be describing it enthusiastically. Instead he's questioning why anyone cares about it.

Let's be clear what Pritzker did here... he chose to take the day before an important deadline to distance himself from the result.

Connect the dots

In one morning you have:

Ganis, on radio, in front of a large Chicago sports audience, naming the specific person blocking Illinois, establishing that the NFL meeting is a single-topic dedicated session on April 29, clarifying that the Bears' decision comes before "late spring/early summer," and describing multiple days of active site meetings in Hammond this week.

Pritzker, at a press availability, saying the scaffolding is there, it's up to the legislature, he'd like them to move faster, and oh by the way there's a budget to pass.

Brenden Moore, at 5:24pm the day of the Stephens meeting, saying "not soup yet, six weeks remain."

These are three different people, in three different positions, all saying versions of the same thing on the same day: Illinois is not going to get this done in time.

Ganis is saying it while pointing a finger. Pritzker is saying it while building an alibi. Moore is saying it while covering for the legislature's inability to act.

The part that should make you stop and think

Ganis said something toward the end of the interview that I keep coming back to. He described Indiana as a better financial structure for the McCaskey family than Arlington Heights would be. State owns the building. Bears control it. No property taxes. No capital expense liability. At the end of 35 years they can buy it. He compared it to Jerry Jones at AT&T Stadium because Jones doesn't own that building, the public does, but he controls it completely. That structure, Ganis said, is actually the ideal owner situation.

He also addressed McCaskey's Phoenix comment about "significant risk" to the family. Ganis confirmed it: the McCaskeys' only asset is the Bears. Taking on $2-3 billion in debt on a building they own outright is genuinely dangerous for a family of their means compared to NFL ownership peers. Indiana's structure limits that exposure significantly.

George McCaskey didn't say "significant risk" by accident in Phoenix. He was already preparing his audience for the explanation of why Indiana makes sense despite the emotional gravity of leaving Illinois.

Where this goes from here

The House deadline to pass bills to the Senate expires tomorrow. They have a 3-day session next week then takes a week recess. Returns May 4.

The Bears present to the NFL Stadium Committee the morning of April 29. As I mentioned yesterday, they'll be presenting the full Hammond package now that the toll road negotiation is complete. This occurs during the Illinois recess, when Springfield cannot act even if it wanted to.

Fertitta's window on Caesars closes April 28 and they deliver an earnings call.

The Orlando owners meeting is May 19-20. If the Bears do not have a league approved stadium option by the end of this meeting, they must wait until October. They will commit to a solution by this deadline.

Every actor in this story is hitting their mark on schedule. Ganis named the villain this morning. Pritzker built his alibi this afternoon. The legislature is heading into a recess that covers the exact window the Bears need to present their Hammond package to the league.

I've been saying for weeks: watch what people do, not what they say. What they're doing is finishing the script.

Previous posts linked below if you want the full arc.

Here I explain the significance of the NFL Stadium Committe meeting announcement the day the toll road was announced.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoBearsNFL/comments/1sm71ma/the_closing_bell_chicago_bears_are_moving_to/

Here I helped translate what Kevin Warren and George McCaskey said during the first owners meeting.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoBearsNFL/comments/1sa42xa/stadium_what_we_learned_from_warren_and_george/

Here is confirmation that the due dilligence on the environmental aspect of Hammond is already completed (later confirmed by Kevin Warren)
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoBearsNFL/comments/1s54uyy/hammond_is_imminent_the_25m_acquisition_due/

Here I explained the actions you see from teams leaving a state versus staying, and what losing states do to lose the team (Hint, the Bears actions point to leaving, Illinois points to complacency losing). This is where I explained the public script we are presently seeing play out.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoBearsNFL/comments/1s4arrf/oc_the_bears_are_going_to_hammond_heres_how_i/

Here I show that Arlington is actually, and in many surprising ways, an inferior option to Hammond.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoBearsNFL/comments/1s2md0n/oc_arlington_is_objectively_a_worse_option_than/

Here I show that Arlington as a site is critically flawed in deeply important ways.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChicagoBearsNFL/comments/1s1ruho/oc_arlington_heights_physically_cannot_host_a/

You can find the interview with Gains here.
https://www.audacy.com/podcasts/mully__haugh_show/episodes/marc_ganis_shares_insight_on_b-8275382

The interview with Pritzker is here.
https://www.bleachernation.com/bears/2026/04/16/pritzker-on-bears-stadium/

Edit: The original version notes Illinois takes a two week break starting Friday. This has been changed to reflect that Illinois has a three day session next week before a 1 week recess.

u/Substantial_Bag_8066 — 5 days ago