u/Prior_Employee_7247

Driving initial traffic to my landing page but waitlist signups are stuck at zero. Any advice on where I'm losing people?

Driving initial traffic to my landing page but waitlist signups are stuck at zero. Any advice on where I'm losing people?

Hey everyone. I've been working on a tool called Forgetti to handle high-volume inboxes, and I'm finally starting to see some initial traffic to the site (stats in the screenshot).

The problem is, my waitlist signups are completely flat at zero.

For context: It’s an AI triage service for Gmail and Outlook. It reads incoming mail via Claude, scores it 0–100 for actual urgency (separating a vital update from a generic newsletter), and splits the inbox into Focus and Buried piles so you only see what genuinely needs your attention.

Because giving an AI access to a professional inbox is a massive hurdle, the entire architecture is strictly read-only OAuth. It physically cannot reply, send, delete, or modify a single thing. A human is always the mandatory checkpoint to leave the building.

But clearly, something on the landing page is causing people to bounce immediately without dropping their email.

If you look at the traffic vs. signups, what do you think the main barrier is? Is the "AI + inbox" combo just too heavy of a psychological trust hurdle for busy professionals, or is my positioning failing to explain the value properly?

Would really appreciate any advice from other builders who have launched tools in a high-privacy space on how to get those first few signups off the ground.

u/Prior_Employee_7247 — 2 days ago
▲ 5 r/Agentic_Marketing+2 crossposts

Getting decent traffic to my landing page but absolutely zero waitlist signups. What am I missing?

hey guys, looking for some honest advice on how to get my project off the ground because right now, i'm flatlining.

i’ve been driving some initial traffic to my site (stats in the screenshot), but conversion is dead at zero. literally nobody is signing up for the waitlist.

for context, i built an ai email triage tool for gmail/outlook because i was drowning in 100+ emails a day. it basically uses an llm to read incoming mail, score it 0–100 based on actual urgency, and hide the noise so you only see the 5% that genuinely requires a human reply.

i knew people would be paranoid about security, so it's built on strictly read-only oauth. it physically cannot send, reply, delete, or modify anything. your inbox stays yours, it just filters the noise.

but looking at these zero signups, i'm starting to think that the second a professional sees "ai" and "inbox" in the same sentence, they just close the tab.

if you’ve launched a tool in a high-privacy or sensitive space, how did you get over this initial hump? is my positioning just failing to explain the value, or is an ai email app an immediate dealbreaker for people?

brutal feedback appreciated.

u/Prior_Employee_7247 — 2 days ago

Missing an important email costs money. I built a read-only AI triage tool to fix it.

Most founders I know check their email 40+ times a day because inbox anxiety is constant. 90% of it is noise, but that 10% is critical.

I’m launching Forgetti. It doesn't replace Gmail or Outlook. It sits alongside them via read-only OAuth, uses Claude to read and score every email from 0–100 based on urgency and relationship, and pulls the vital stuff into a "Focus" inbox. The rest is quietly "Buried."

The core differentiator is trust: your inbox stays yours. It literally cannot send, reply, or delete anything.

I'm opening a strict 200-person waitlist and giving 3 months free to 10 early members. I’d love feedback from this community on the messaging—does the privacy focus resonate, or do you need to see the AI scoring in action first?

reddit.com
u/Prior_Employee_7247 — 2 days ago

Roast my AI email assistant. Is "read-only" enough to make you trust AI in your inbox?

Tear this apart.

The product is Forgetti (forgetti.co.uk). It’s an AI email triage service for Gmail and Outlook.

The Premise: 90% of your inbox is noise. You miss important emails because they get buried under automated newsletters. Forgetti reads your incoming mail, scores it 0-100 for urgency, and splits it into "Focus" and "Buried."

The Differentiator: Superhuman just makes you sort your own trash faster. We use AI to actually judge importance so you don't have to sort at all.

The Friction Point: People are terrified of letting AI read their email. We counter this by using strictly read-only OAuth. We literally cannot send, modify, or delete an email.

Roast the landing page, the concept, and the messaging. Will pragmatic professionals pay for this, or is the security hurdle too high to overcome?

reddit.com
u/Prior_Employee_7247 — 3 days ago

Seeking busy founders/execs to test an AI email triage tool (Gmail & Outlook)

If you receive 100+ emails a day and suffer from "inbox anxiety," I need your feedback.

I'm building Forgetti. It’s an AI tool that doesn't just filter your email by keywords, but actually reads it and scores it 0–100 based on urgency, relationship, and required action.

The goal is to give you a "Focus" inbox containing only the 5% of emails that genuinely need your attention today, while quietly burying the rest of the noise.

Tech & Privacy:

  • Works with your existing Gmail or Outlook.
  • Strictly read-only OAuth (cannot send, reply, or delete anything).
  • Tokens are encrypted at rest.

I’m capping the early-access waitlist at 200 users to ensure stability. If you're willing to poke holes in the interactive demo and give me honest feedback, check it out here: forgetti.co.uk.

reddit.com
u/Prior_Employee_7247 — 3 days ago