
My attempt conceptualizing 2 new opposing ethics
Edit 1: I've been playing for a year and TIL these used to exist. I SWEAR I didn't know that, but now the post looks stupid 😑.
Edit 2: I can now see why these ethics were changed lol. I still stand by my idea though. Someone labeled Auth vs Egal as societal "power" structure which I love. That didn't cover what I would call "lifestyle" though, so that's what my version is. Individualist vs collectivist is societal "lifestyle".
Edit 3: people understandably take issue with the "cocky" nature of the individualist text. I reanalyzed and I stand by it, also. I was born and raised in one of the most individualist nations on Earth and probably ~50% of people here have that exact same attitude. And you know what, why shouldn't they? They work very hard for the things they have and their daily decisions have relatively large impacts on the world. They own it.
Didn't feel like fetching the proper bonus icons, so use your imagination.
Some contrary points that I am forecasting:
- "Aren't these too close to Auth vs Egal?"
Here's some historical examples as potential proof (not a historian so feel free to correct me):
- Individualist Auth: N*zi Germany
- Collective Auth: Early India?, + USSR
- Individualist Egal: Early US
- Collective Egal: Actually not sure about this one, possibly some African countries? Or Haiti maybe?, +Indonesia
Thoughts?