SARMs are misunderstood IMO
(Btw I haven’t really done research on any other sarms other than Ostarine so I’m generalizing Ostarine for this discussion)
Most people look at sarms and think “worse muscle growth for more unfavorable side effects”. Which is completely true. But why does no one talk about sarms specifically Ostarine at its ability to promote anti-catabolism at a side effect ratio that would not be possible with steroids? To get equivalent MuRF1/MAFbx suppression and FOXO inhibition from testosterone you need doses that come with significant androgenic burden like prostate stimulation, scalp DHT conversion, hematocrit elevation, HPTA suppression that would require PCT or permanent TRT. I mean Ostarine clinically is being tested for muscle catabolism. So why is low dose Ostarine (3mg-10mg) not popular for people cutting when there’s literature and evidence to support that it has a favorable side effect profile for this use?