
Here’s an interesting short video on tik tok from an account going by Brent Turvey. And here’s a SS from it where it tells you when forensic experts are not obligated to abide to an NDA.

Here’s an interesting short video on tik tok from an account going by Brent Turvey. And here’s a SS from it where it tells you when forensic experts are not obligated to abide to an NDA.
Saw it posted by TT on YouTube
I thought I’d post this so that people who haven’t bought the book, can see what a lot of the book focuses on
The last chapter really ties it together (for me anyway). It tells you what he focuses on in the book and what his main issues are with the case. I think most will agree that a lot of it are things that have been issues with us as well when we discuss the case.
He holds off saying things straight out about certain parts and like many have said, you have to read between the lines. I'm guessing thats down to what he can say without being sued.
I found the book really good. Yes theres a few details that are wrong but I'm not sure if that's because it's in the files he's reading or down to a mistake on his behalf. He does mention a couple of things in the investigation that had been said by LE and then proven wrong yet never corrected by LE.
Like Bryan not using his card after a certain date etc.
All in all, I think he hits on things that make us realise we're not going crazy when we wonder WHY? If that makes any sense.
From what I can tell, there's nothing different in the paper version to the digital version and its peanuts to buy if you buy the digital version. Unlike Sy rays book which is set to
sell for $95
I’ve also included a snippet of a witness who was with Dylan that night, who called in on the 1st of December to tell LE that Dylan wasn’t drunk that night.
Here’s the note that CW talks about. I found it on X. So that backs up what he’s wrote in the book. Also a snippet from the book where his mum said that Bryan’s car had a different front than the one that LE had been looking for