Hello,
I am seeing more clients who wants me to use AI generated output (patent application, OA responses). How do you deal with these clients? What arguments do you use? Do these arguments work?
Ideally I want to say LLM written response don't work at USPTO, but I've seen it get allowances. So saying that is not truthful.
Another argument is if you give my draft to LLM, it can be interpreted as public disclosure, but the thing is I don't think this has been litigated determinatively.
I'm trying to keep my sanity because these clients are taking a lot of time because they keep going back and forth between my advice and AI response. With these clients, what ends up happening is we land somewhere in the middle (between what I said and what the LLM said).
Or is the problem me in that do I need to get with the times and incorporate it in my workflow?
Ultimately, I want to keep clients happy while keeping my sanity.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.