Occam's Razor
Obviously just about everyone on the internet invokes this maxim incorrectly. And many goofs even treat it as an axiom (without even understanding it).
But as it relates to the case, is the TRUE usage of Occam's Razor to conclude Amy fell off the balcony or got trafficked?
From another thread where goofs were hallucinating she fell was "occam's razor" that didn't require assumptions -
My response -
You would have to assume all the sightings of fully awake people on the ship AFTER she would have fallen are all wrong/not reliable (INCLUDING PEOPLE WHO SPECIFICALLY KNEW HER), while ASSUMING the sighting of "legs" by her half/full asleep father is infallible and gospel.
You would have to assume all the search teams are incompetent and cannot find someone falling overboard in a narrow channel (has that EVER happened before)?
You would have to assume it's all "coincidental" that all these sightings of her or her lookalike JUST SO HAPPEN to include THE SAME HANDLERS in the different countries in different years, one of which has been arrested for prostitution rings and you would also have to assume it's all "coincidental" that Jas photos showed up on the website owned by a guy who employed the handler previously arrested for prostitution rings who himself had been arrested for prostitution rings in the Caribbean.