Login

u/LanosZar

Beauty Schools charge $20,000 for a career that pays less than Walmart, should they keep access to Federal Aid? New Data Suggests No
▲ 199 r/StudentLoans

Beauty Schools charge $20,000 for a career that pays less than Walmart, should they keep access to Federal Aid? New Data Suggests No

The Department of Education is currently deciding whether to grant for-profit beauty schools "relief" from the AHEAD Framework—and the data is staggering.

Cosmetology schools, particularly for-profits, offer outdated, weak lessons that don’t prepare them for a career in beauty, recent New America research found. On average, 80% of graduates of for-profit beauty schools fail to earn more than they would have with only their high school diplomas, according to the research.

We have until May 20, 2026, to tell the government to stop subsidizing these debt traps.

The Data: A Industry in Distress

The newest analysis of mid-2025 Department of Education data reveals why the industry is terrified:

  • The Default Crisis: Out of 1,100 schools flagged for high loan distress, beauty schools account for nearly 40%.
  • The Big Names are Failing: This isn't just "mom and pop" schools. Major chains - Paul Mitchell and Empire Beauty School locations - up to 42% of students cannot pay their debt - no one is bailing these students out.
  • The Earnings Gap: Taxpayers are essentially funding $20,000 programs that leave students with no path to paying back their loans.
  • The Big Lie: They tell new students the field is growing, but data shows as little as 60% of new stylists could find jobs.
  • The only people getting rich are the schools. The multi-Billion Dollar Beauty School industry is trying to buy influence with politicians to change a law targeting their industry.

🚨 HOW TO TAKE ACTION (Deadline: May 20, 2026)

Don't let lobbyists be the only voice the government hears. Tell the Dept of Ed to hold the line on the AHEAD framework.

  1. GO TO:Regulations.gov - ED-2026-OPE-0100-0001
  2. SELECT CATEGORY: Private/For-Profit Institution of Higher Education
  3. SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT: Tell them that taxpayers shouldn't fund programs that leave 80% of students in a worse financial position than when they started.

Short on time? Ask an AI: "Write a 4,000-character public comment for the Dept of Ed explaining how the 'Do No Harm' rule and AHEAD framework close debt traps in beauty schools, citing the 80% failure-to-earn rate found by New America."

Stop the Debt Trap. Protect the Industry. Hold the Line.

Upvote1Downvote0Go to comments

u/LanosZar — 5 days ago
▲ 1 r/KDP

Trim sizes

I would like to maximize size but I am worried about trim, Ai says I should do 8.5x11 A4, but i am afraid the printer will want to trim past that and it will cost me money as it will not maximize pages per sheet. Hope you understand what I am saying. Can someone clarify this for me - I am brand new to KDP.

reddit.com
u/LanosZar — 5 days ago
▲ 45 r/Cosmetology

The Beauty School "1,500-Hour" Scam is Being Challenged. We have until the deadline May 20th 2026 to tell the Dept of Ed to STOP giving them a pass.

The Department of Education is currently deciding whether to grant for-profit beauty schools "relief" from the AHEAD Framework—and the data is staggering.

According to a recent report, the "Do No Harm" rule is exposing a crisis: 80% of graduates from for-profit beauty schools fail to earn more than a typical high school graduate. We have until May 20, 2026, to tell the government to stop subsidizing these debt traps.

The Data: A Industry in Distress

The newest analysis of mid-2025 Department of Education data reveals why the industry is terrified:

  • The Default Crisis: Out of 1,100 schools flagged for high loan distress, beauty schools account for nearly 40%.
  • The Big Names are Failing: This isn't just "mom and pop" schools. Major chains - Paul Mitchell and Empire Beauty School locations - as high as 42**%** of students cannot pay their debt.
  • The Earnings Gap: Taxpayers are essentially funding $20,000 programs that leave students with no path to paying back their loans.

The "Phantom Income" Myth

The industry’s lobbying group (AACS) claims 92.5% of schools will fail the "Do No Harm" test. Their only defense? Claiming that stylists "hide" all their money in cash tips. The Truth: They are asking the government to ignore the IRS and official wage data so they can keep charging $20k tuition for $12/hour outcomes. If the "tips" were that good, the loan non-payment rates wouldn't be at 42%.

The "Closure" Scare Tactic

Schools are "crying wolf," claiming they will shutter if the rule is enforced. This is a lie.

  • Survival of the Fittest: High-quality programs where students actually succeed will be unaffected.
  • Lower Tuition: If the government stops backing $20k loans for failing schools, they will be forced to lower tuition to $4k–$6k—the price point where community colleges already operate successfully.

Why it Matters: The Harm to Our Industry

When schools flood the market with graduates who are desperate to pay back $20k in debt, it drives down commission rates and wages for everyone. This isn't just about the students; it's about the survival of the craft.

🚨 HOW TO TAKE ACTION (Deadline: May 20, 2026)

Don't let lobbyists be the only voice the government hears. Tell the Dept of Ed to hold the line on the AHEAD framework.

  1. GO TO:Regulations.gov - ED-2026-OPE-0100-0001
  2. SELECT CATEGORY: Private/For-Profit Institution of Higher Education
  3. SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT: Tell them that taxpayers shouldn't fund programs that leave 80% of students in a worse financial position than when they started.

Short on time? Ask an AI: "Write a 4,000-character public comment for the Dept of Ed explaining how the 'Do No Harm' rule and AHEAD framework close debt traps in beauty schools, citing the 80% failure-to-earn rate found by New America."

Stop the Debt Trap. Protect the Industry. Hold the Line.

reddit.com
u/LanosZar — 6 days ago