u/Junior-Asparagus718

I recently posted this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/1t97mrh/evolutionists_what_are_the_best_arguments_against/

The point was to test my hypothesis that the majority of the contributors here live in an echo chamber and are incapable of presenting any arguments from the opposing side. I was correct in my hypothesis. Many comments compared denial of macroevolution to believing in a flat earth and even denying the concept of gravity.

Nearly all these self-proclaimed experts on the topic here operate on the assumption that it's an open and shut case: the theory of evolution, and specifically, macroevolution, is true with complete certainty.

However, what they don't realize is that there are numerous PhD's on both sides of the argument, many with irrefutable points.

In short, if you're unable to summarize any of the arguments for other side, you definitionally live in an echo chamber.

Rage bait, sure, but it's true, and the proof is in the thread.

I'm curious if anyone here even knows any of the main arguments against macroevolution. It seems this community is just an echo chamber, bashing skeptics of evolution without even knowing their arguments.

I know you can cheat and ask AI/Google for arguments and their counter points, but at that point, you've already admitted defeat.

Anyone have any idea what “good” traffic is for a church website? It’s likely relative to local population, I’m just curious how our site is performing relative to some other sites out there — determining if it’s worth putting extra effort and money into SEO or something.

I’m really looking for website stat examples like visitors/page views for a given city. Also curious what that should translate to as far as physical visitors on a Sunday.