u/Jairo_Alves

https://preview.redd.it/zxh0qevkhqyg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ef1195c29a975bcaeade441fcfa2e75e31c8a7c0

Measurement is the Achilles' heel of quantum physics. The primary phenomena that hinder its precision, along with my proposals for their occurrence, are as follows:

 

1. Superposition: A particle possesses multiple state possibilities, but when measured, it reveals only one, omitting the others—making it impossible to know its true nature. Proposal: The processes generating particles must cyclically alternate their characteristics, as they are sustained by energetic flows.

2. The Exchange: If two values of a particle are related, it is only possible to precisely measure one, as the other naturally becomes undetectable. Proposal: The absence of a reference point for measuring the second value, since particles are dynamic and their characteristic values are synchronized.

3. Observational Interference: This occurs because quantum logic is altered by the resources employed in its observation. Proposal: A physical interference that activates a natural security protocol to preserve systemic integrity.

 

In short, the challenge of quantum measurement reveals that the world-system was "designed" to deliver final results. What physics calls uncertainty or collapse, systems engineering identifies as the preservation of source code. Measurement fails because it is an attempted violation of an energetic "source code" in full execution within the world-system's firmware. The problems occurring in quantum measurement are not mystical; theoretically, they stem from the natural logic of data governance.

 

The cosmic microwave background is considered the "holy grail" of cosmology. It is the oldest physical data ever captured regarding the universe. It is present throughout the entire universe, filling it almost uniformly, and its tiny temperature (2.725 Kelvin) is practically the same in all directions.

 

The cosmic microwave background is considered a residual glow from when the universe was only 380,000 years old (the basis of the Big Bang theory). Its minute temperature variations are considered evidence of matter density variations at that time. Its current temperature is considered proof of the universe's continuous expansion. Its status as microwaves is an effect of this expansion over billions of years. Its current, longer wavelength is considered an effect of this expansion.

 

To me, the cosmic microwave background has always been this way and will continue to be, as the universe is a completely closed thermal system. It could only stop if its processing stopped definitively, since in nature, everything transforms thermally. Ontologically, the cosmic background (ether, quantum void, vacuum, Higgs field, akasha) is the “non-being” of philosophy, and the cosmic microwave background is a fundamental thermal “being.” Computationally, it is an energetic firmware analogous to a self-processing memory board (non-bits), and the cosmic microwave background represents natural bits. More details supporting this perspective are in my book “THE SPIN” (available on Amazon).

https://preview.redd.it/psk93coqueyg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ab7ffa975b66f0da0ae96e145a94343e66efb3cd

The expansion of the universe was initially detected through the Doppler effect, and its acceleration was later confirmed. The size of the observable universe (93 billion light-years) is also irrefutable proof of this expansion, as it far exceeds its estimated age (13.8 billion years).

 

The main hypotheses proposed for the expansion of the universe are:

 

1.      The standard model (the most accepted): it suggests that expansion is caused by a constant energy pressure inherent to the spatial vacuum.

 

1. Quintessence: Suggests expansion is caused by dark energy acting as a dynamic field that varies over time.

2. Systemic Mechanics: Its proponents do not explain the cause of expansion and consider its acceleration a perceptual error caused by ignorance of the laws of physics at vast distances.

3. The "Big Rip": An increase in the disintegrating power of dark energy.

4. The Big Bounce/Big Crunch: Suggests that expansion is followed by a contraction and a new Big Bang.

I propose "The Great Bomb Theory": an eternal cycle (Big Bounce/Big Crunch) executed by the world-system (universe) with two primary purposes:

 

• Operational: To generate a master wave function that enables the system to function eternally.

• Security: To prevent an intelligent "biota virus" from spreading and completely destroying its host, the world-system, before forming a "brainnet" capable of integrating with the system responsibly.

 

From a Systems Engineering perspective, the accelerated expansion of the universe is not an isolated event but part of a systemic protocol loop. The world-system is not merely expanding; it is homeostatically reconfiguring itself to ensure uninterrupted operation.

 

https://preview.redd.it/ujz7ntnpi7yg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=979aed871d731d987b222e7a3611a32e051a9d8a

The composition of the world (universe) structure is estimated at 5% baryonic matter (common), 27% dark matter, and 68% dark energy.

 

The data supporting these figures come from sources such as: the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), type Ia supernovae (standard candles), Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), and gravitational lensing and galaxy dynamics.

 

However, I propose recalculating these numbers based on three pillars:

 

1. The origin of baryonic matter is non-baryonic matter (dark matter);

2. The CMB is omnipresent;

3. The origin of the CMB is dark matter;

 

This means that: dark matter is also omnipresent, capable of performing actions and, consequently, a force that requires no fragmentation and is not matter; dark energy is its capacity to work; the "energetic field" is the operational environment where data (common matter) manifests; the visible is merely the interface of an immensely larger processing system.

 

Therefore, by logic, the world is a force-flow system composed of 5% matter and the remaining 95% by a force and its energetic capacity, which are intrinsic to each other and to the world-system.

General Systems Theory (GST) proposes focusing the study of the world's structure and functioning on totality and interdependencies (networks and flows between nodes), without fragmenting it into linear cause-and-effect relationships, to make it more productive.

GST advocates the need to identify the following elements present in any phenomenon:

 

• Totality (Holism): Any system is greater than the sum of its parts.

• Entropy and Negentropy: The tendency toward disorder and order in closed and open systems, respectively.

• Homeostasis and Dynamic Equilibrium: The capacity for self-regulation to maintain systemic integrity in the face of environmental changes.

• Equifinality: The ability to achieve the same result through different variables and paths while preserving the same procedural logic.

 

Steps for applying GST: Identifying physical boundaries (hardware) and procedural boundaries (software) with the external environment; analyzing all types of natural inputs, processing, and outputs; understanding the procedural feedback loop; and searching for patterns throughout the functional architecture (isomorphism).

 In short, applying GST means asking: "How does this relate to the rest and what is its function in the larger system?", rather than simply "What is this made of?". It is the migration from the physics of matter to information engineering; information is a fundamental requirement of reality—without it, structure, form, and natural functionalities would never exist, nor would they be intelligible.

 

https://preview.redd.it/pohnykm740yg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e4ba095a4a06a333e7753f41916e1abdd7e7506d

"Infology: The Universal Input" is the result of this application; it presents an original perspective, with irrefutable arguments, in which the world ceases to be just a "chaotic accumulation of things" to become a totally closed, hierarchical system of information processing.

Fermi considered the extremely high probability of extraterrestrial civilizations to be contradictory, based on the age and vastness of the universe and the total absence of evidence or contact with them.

 

Pros: The statistics favoring the probability of life, the universality of the laws of nature, the abundance of biological inputs in the cosmos, the speed with which life emerged on Earth, and the age of the universe would comfortably allow for galactic occupation.

 

Cons: Assuming space colonization as a universal priority, disregarding the physical barriers of interstellar travel, ignoring that radio communication may be obsolete in other civilizations, assuming that stable planets like Earth are common, and ignoring the possibility of civilizations existing concurrently.

 

I add to this list the hypothesis of a functional segregation of environments as a security measure to protect the integrity of the world-system from sub-systemic failures (a kind of cosmic sandboxing).

In short, Fermi's proposition is paradoxical because it presumes that we know what to look for, how to look for it, and the behavior of other intelligences, without considering that the absence of life could merely result from our technological and intellectual limitations and, above all, our lack of knowledge regarding the "real" architecture of the universal system.

Currently, some physicists consider the possibility of there being infinite parallel universes where all existences are superimposed. From the systems engineering perspective presented in "Intelligencism: An Intelligent View of the World", this possibility is unfeasible as it would invalidate the very architecture of the universe.

 

The functional architecture of the universe in "Infology: The Universal Input" is that of an extremely powerful, precise, and hierarchical information processing system, from the micro to the macrocosm; the existence of infinite redundant copies, including of space-time, would be the pinnacle of redundancy and systemic inefficiency.

 

From the logical perspective of "Intelligencism", the "multiverse" proposal is a misinterpretation resulting from the observer's hierarchical position. What physicists suggest are alternative realities are merely different processing layers within a single universal system.

 

A functional and lean system does not require infinite versions of itself to operate efficiently and effectively; it only needs its code to be optimized. The complexity of this proposal reveals a lack of understanding of Occam's Razor and the Master Key that governs this universe simultaneously. The path to understanding the universe is much simpler: one must integrate the information already available into a single informational, logical, and completely closed system.

 

In short, the multiverse is a fantasy resulting from scientific fragmentation; understanding the structure of the universe does not require complex acrobatics—simply applying systems engineering correctly is enough to reach it.

 

https://preview.redd.it/8klaeh39xlxg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=35acf65858fdcb7cdb9009ed56092f1c71f7b1fd

A BrainNet is a network formed by individuals who share common parameters capable of defining their way of thinking and behavior (beliefs and values).

 

The humanity's BrainNet is made of several sub-brainnets (bubbles). Some of them are sources of conflict and barriers to personal, intellectual, social, and humanistic development, as well as coexistence (protocol clash). They perpetuate systemic conflict, making it prevail over and precede physical conflict, because they tend to accept only their own way of being.

 

When they collide, the result is noise: what is truth for one network is seen as an error or a lie by the other, generating a state of "processing war" where the only goal is to protect their own borders. The main consequences are empathy restricted to the group, intellectual stagnation, and the death of humanism in isolation.

 

The cure lies in three pillars of systems integration:

 

1. Personal Development: The individual needs to see their own prejudices as "system filters"; this makes them capable of processing information without the immediate need to agree or disagree with it.

2. Intellectual Development: The individual must realize that the truth is not inside their bubble and become accustomed to listening and reflecting on contradictory views.

3. Humanistic Development: The individual must learn to act as an "integrator" of processes or systems, relaying truly relevant information from one bubble to another; the end or escalation of conflict in the network depends on the substance of this information.

 

In short, for the future and the world to be better for everyone, individuals must learn to have courage, boldness, and the will to present dissuasive arguments instead of fostering duels, as this is the only way for the world to become a single BrainNet and “imagine all the people living life in peace.”

 

Currently, pursuing the truth is highly fragmented. The physicist studies the particle, the biologist studies the cell, and the philosopher studies abstraction.

 

This is necessary and excellent for understanding the pieces of the world and expanding knowledge. However, this fragmentation hinders the formation of a holistic view of the world’s mechanism.

 

One way to overcome this problem is by integrating the information regarding the existing pieces of the world's mechanism. For the architecture of the universe is sustained by a vast set of complementary, interdependent, and hierarchical parts, from the micro to the macrocosm.

 

The future belongs to the integrators. However, reconstructing the puzzle of the world requires courage and boldness to cross disciplinary boundaries. The reward for those who face this challenge is to begin understanding the logic behind the structure and the functioning of the world.

 

Quantum physics studies microcosmic procedural relationships while ignoring macrocosmic procedural integration; systems engineering studies the integration of procedural relationships at all levels of natural reality.

 

Quantum physics focuses on the structure of the "brick" (the particle); systems engineering focuses on the structure of the "house" (the world).

 

Quantum physics generates paradoxes such as "wave-particle duality" and "quantum entanglement"; in systems engineering, both are merely perspectives of trivial phenomena perceptible in networks (perspective/synchronization).

 

Quantum physics mystifies because it focuses only on the foundation of reality; systems engineering demystifies because it views reality holistically.

Quantum physics is unable to coherently connect to the structures of the world's other components because it focuses on particles; systems engineering succeeds because it focuses on information, regardless of where the world's components are located.

 

While quantum physics admires the projected images and describes the scene; Systems Engineering goes to the projection booth, collects technical information about the projection, and explains the rendering mechanism. In other words: it explains the world as a finished, logical, and functional engineering project.

Gravity is one of the most debated phenomena in the history of science. Its definition changes drastically depending on the observer's point of view:

 

1. Classical View (Newton): A force of mutual attraction (pull) between masses, proportional to them.

2. Relativistic View (Einstein): A curvature (cosmic lens/cavity) in the fabric of space-time caused by mass and energy that makes celestial bodies "slide".

3. Quantum View: An attractive force field resulting from the exchange of messages through theoretical particles called gravitons.

 

To me, gravity is a force field because attraction requires action; curvature, cosmic lenses, or cavities require the presence of a force field; and the graviton is merely an assumption."

https://preview.redd.it/1gu4vf1w38wg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c177d87139ee86629943f2433f675958e2063b43

Force is the sole active agent capable of taking action (executing physical processes); energy is its "capacity to work" (its processing power); both are intrinsic system properties, and work is the product (procedural output) of their combined application.