I know everyone thinks they’re right but I’m way more right
Okay hear me out. Every simplification of this problem removes one or more factors, and it’s USUALLY the fact that pushing the red button measurably increases the risk that blue dies. If you were to be one of 2 people to lift a table, of course it matters if you lift it. But when it’s billions, suddenly our brains shut off. So try this one.
Would you drive drunk if you were in an indestructible car and couldn’t be hurt by any accidents during the drive?
You can drunk drive in this hypothetical without increasing the risk to yourself.
You cannot drunk drive in this hypothetical without increasing the risk to others.
Just like you cannot press the red button without increasing risk to those that pressed blue.
Removing the risk to others fundamentally changes the question, which is why most logic is flawed.
So would you drive drunk in an indestructible car if it meant you couldn’t be hurt at all? Try to answer without giving random passerby immunity for no reason or the ability to matrix dodge.
If you think getting arrested is a problem, WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK THE BLUE VOTERS ARE GONNA DO TO THE RED VOTERS IF THEY WIN? You just got sorted into the most logically justifiable group to hate/punish, and helped create an organized majority that you don’t belong to. That’s a lil worse than jail time. People do awful things to people for much less justifiable reasons.
Or they all die, and you’re left with everyone who doesn’t believe that they have responsibility for their actions. Sweet, you’re alive. Do you think a lot of doctors don’t give a shit about that kind of stuff? The ones that take an oath starting “first, do no harm?” Hope you don’t get sick!
Logically how can red make sense?
“But the blue voters could have just not voted blue”
Yeah but they did so using sound logic, and not expecting to die. And then you made a separate decision to increase the risk of them dying to save yourself.
It’s no different to “they shouldn’t have been on the road near me”. They knew going outside was a risk, but they still did it expecting to be safe, which was not an unreasonable expectation, and you made that less likely.
Generally we call those people criminals.