u/IJesusChrist

BIOA has been weak from its earlier highs in the $20s, and I'm really not sure why. They have an R&D day later this week, you can register here if you want: https://ir.bioagelabs.com/news-releases/news-release-details/bioage-host-rd-day-focused-nlrp3-inhibition-may-8-2026

BIOA easily has one of the most important and interesting assets in all of immunology right now and I don't say that often. The NLRP3 target is really well validated, by both BIOA and some competitors. VTYX was bought this year for $1.2b, a very small premium for what I think BIOA will go for in just 1 year's time (likely less). Here is the bullish pitch (I will share the risks below too): BIOA has better NLRP3, IL-6 lowering, hsCRP lowering than what VTYX showed, and is on par with what GLUE showed (which is not the same target, but similar). It also showed (in my opinion, some disagree), better results than The private company NodThera.

  1. The biggest catalyst is actually not BIOA's data - it is a study from NovoNordisk called ZEUS. ZEUS is a study of an Ziltivekimab in cardiovascular risk patients who also have kidney disease. It will read out probably in the 3rd quarter this year, but maybe sooner. It's hard to tell because it is driven by the number of events, not a certain timeframe.

If that is positive, that would imply that any study that BIOA runs in a similar setting would be as positive or better - and BIOA drug is ORAL. Not an injection. It's well tolerated.

  1. BIOA drug also has some good exposure in the eye. That is important because there are some anti-IL-6 drugs that are being studied in ocular diseases like wAMD, GA, etc. These are ENORMOUS markets - you may be familiar with Regeneron's Eylea which has been a monster blockbuster drug for a decade, selling billions. If IL-6 works well in the eye, again, NLRP3 oral drug will work as well.

If you combine the cardiovascular indications and ocular, you are looking at a $5b+ drug, easily, if not more. And BIOA has the best data out there.

CONCERNS? There is competition. Like I said - GLUE, VTYX (now LLY), NodThera, and a few other privates have NLRP3 inhibitors. But only GLUE has data that really matches up with BIOA. And GLUE is around 2x more expensive, mostly because they have a separate partnership with another asset.

Safety? So far the drug has been really well tolerated. The older NLRP3 drugs had really bad drug properties, low bioavailability or short half lifes, and some had liver toxicity. But BIOA avoids all this because their drug is completely different, chemically speaking and biologically.

I think BIOA should be fairly priced in the ~$25 range - without ANY additional data. WITH additional data, this will be above $40 - including if ZEUS is successful in the fall(ish) time frame this year.

reddit.com
u/IJesusChrist — 10 days ago

To be clear, this was NOT my original thesis in buying CUE but now my conviction has increased significantly.

The news:

New CEO and new asset. The asset is an anti-IgE. The last IgE that I can remember was RAPT. Guess what happened to RAPT? It got acquired. 🥁 🥁 🥁 for $2.2 billion by GSK just in March this year.

Granted I dont know that much about this asset as this is fresh off the press, this news is HUGE. Now we have a CEO who's been around the block and an asset with a real head-to-head catalyst coming THIS YEAR. They have chinese trial with an active control arm coming in the 2nd half of the year.

THIS IS AWESOME. The stock trades at around $166M market cap at $23/sh. At $2b, like RAPT price, this would trade at $277 per share.

reddit.com
u/IJesusChrist — 14 days ago