
At least according to AI, the image in the photograph and the coordinates I entered that were listed in the documentary say this is the same hill.
However, Bob Lazar has stated that the hanger doors had a 60 degree angle to match the slope of the mountain:
https://youtu.be/o-3PYL1isrM?si=VR1YdaxDtwESa0UX&t=1680
(Of note, Bob originally stated the slope to be 30 degrees https://youtu.be/BoJmd2MIpOk?si=WDBXuUVq6K4KtEB9&t=755, but later changed to 60 degrees, possibly changing the story due to realizing that a 30 degree angle hanger door would create very visible doors, or maybe he orginally got grade and degrees interchanged?)
The 60 degree angle appears to be what is portrayed in the new documentary and also from the Lazar Tape from 1991.
But here is the problem, when I ask Gemini "What is the slope of that hill?", it says it is approximately 8 to 17 degrees?? That is much more shallow than the 60 degrees Bob Lazar claimed the hanger doors were.
I double checked Genimi's analysis by running a slope estimate on google earth, and it gave me similar numbers with a max slope of 19.6 degrees.
Another Slope Measurement form Bird's Eye View
So, if this hill truly, at most, has a 20 degree slope, the 60 degree hangers purported by Bob would not work on this hill.
Next, I drew a white box over the first hanger door like this:
I then asked Gemini if this white box was a hanger with a 60 degree slope, would that hanger match the slope of this hill. This is what it said:
Based on a strictly topographical analysis of the hill at 37°06'50.0"N 115°50'18.0"W, it is highly unlikely that the white box naturally correlates with a 60-degree slope.
1. The Conflict Between Claims and Topography
- The Natural Slope: Geological data and satellite elevation models show the natural incline of this specific hill is approximately 17 degrees. A 60-degree slope is nearly four times steeper than the actual terrain, making it a vertical cliff-like feature that would be extremely prominent and physically distinct from the rest of the mound.
- The Lazar Narrative: The "60-degree" figure is specifically provided by Bob Lazar to describe camouflaged hangar doors.
2. Proportional Mismatch
- Scale: If the white box truly represented a 60-degree structure on a hill that only rises 80 feet, it would create a massive, sharp "step" in the mountain's profile.
- Visual Evidence: In both the "actual photograph" and Google Earth renders, the hill maintains a relatively consistent, gentle gradient. There is no topographical "break" or sharp vertical face that matches a 60-degree angle at that location.
3. Conclusion on Correlation
- Correlation with the Story: The white box correlates with the location of the alleged hangars in the Lazar story.
- Correlation with the Physics: The box does not correlate with a 60-degree physical feature. If a 60-degree hangar door were placed there, it would not "match" the slope; it would be a distinct, steep protrusion that contradicts the natural 17-degree topography of the hill.
I would love someone to double check this slope info and I certainly could be missing something, but based on my review it seems very unlikley that this hill and these images match Bob's account of 60 degree hanger doors built into the side of a steep mountain. This hill's slope just doesn't appear to correlate with that account.