Beginner In Need of Guidance.
Hello everyone. I just started reading Being and Time (at chapter 18). I only got interested in Heidegger because of an existentialist psychotherapist named Irvin Yalom since he somewhat bases a lot of his clinical practices theory on Heidegger's ideas of Dasein, Authenticity and Throwness etc. My only background in philosophy is a few books from Kierkegaard and one quarter finished Prolegomena To Future Metaphyscists by Kant so it is very bountiful. I had a few questions I wanted to ask here because searching has only made it worse since everyone says differently.
1- Is using AI like Claude while reading Heidegger bad? I gave Magda King's pdf to the AI for it to read and answer my questions so the source is solid. I have benefited a lot from the AI's ability to quickly tell me ready-to-hand or objectively present (Stambaugh curse thy translations) and similar lingo quickly while explaining it too. It is also helpful when I really don't understand a paragraph and in need of guidance. Do you think that AI is good enough to answer basic questions about Being and Time or is there a really big chance it is messing up and I do not realize it?
2- Is Magda King a good parallel read for Being and Time? I am really looking for a commentary book that goes over chapter to chapter (or at least concept to concept) of the Stambaugh revised translation? I heard the most popular one Dreyfus is actually really biased.
3- Is it normal to be so fucking lost? I am reading through it but it's very slowly to the point where I can only read 5-10 pages in a good day! It's one of the hardest books I have ever read but it feels like it points out things I have always felt but couldn't explain so I love it but I'm just wondering if reading 10 pages at most a day is too slow?
4- Do I have to understand every single paragraph? I won't lie, I am not here for a philosophy degree. I am just a medical student who wishes to practice psychiatry and to incorporate the ideas of Heidegger into practice in psychotherapy. For example the way I understand the 14-18 chapter is Heidegger claiming that the worldishness of the world is not referential totality itself, but the significance which allows for this referential totality to be grasped by the Dasein to use objects as ready-to-hand. Is this a wrong understanding? How do I know I understand it correctly or not? I also still dont fucking understand what significance is actually is or a lot of the terminology, I have a feeling but no concrete way to explain it if one asks me. Is that okay?