CGA substantial failure, durability and consequential loss
In 2021 I bought a flagship computer system as parts with a $1300 AMD 5950x CPU. The CPU failed within 1 year. This is a known common fault with that CPU. I RMAed the CPU in April 2022. I also bought a new $350 power supply from the same retailer to troubleshoot the issue and rule out power supply failure. The replacement CPU has now developed the exact same fault and is out of warranty. I no longer trust these 5950x CPUs and it is a substantial failure that fails the "reasonable durability".
The problem is, to get an equivalent replacement, a 9950X3D, which is maybe 30% faster but the exact same price I paid for the 5950X, I would also need a new motherboard and memory for that new CPU, which is roughly $1700 extra. Could I claim for the newer motherboard and memory under "consequential loss"?
I mean if I request a refund for the CPU I am still stuck with a motherboard and memory that is useless due to the untrustworthy CPUs, and incompatible with the newer CPUs. I could buy the newer CPU but to be "made whole" would cost me an extra $1700 on top. The newer CPU would be "betterment" but is the exact same value. The motherboard and memory are equivalent but not really "betterment".
What do you guys think? Would they be liable for the $350 power supply and the newer motherboard and memory under consequential loss? Thanks in advance.
According to google, "A CPU typically has an expected physical lifespan of 10 to 20+ years"
The CPU was liquid cooled, with light loads and was always run at stock with no overclocking