u/Ghost_BusterIRL

Check one of these posts where he also blames everything on short clothes a while ago and it's disgusting. https://www.reddit.com/r/InstaCelebsGossip/s/Kkg1aUsq98

Soonali asked a simple social question to a man: what defines a “real man,” and what is his mindset regarding women wearing short clothes? Somehow, instead of discussing h*rassment culture, consent, or the mentality behind victim blaming, this MRA immediately dragged the conversation into testosterone, beards, masculinity, and “low T men.” What does facial hair have to do with respecting women? He has beard, but he is a misogynist. So it is BS logic.

What Sonali is doing is literally street-level social commentary. She goes outside, asks "uncomfortable" questions, and exposes public mindsets. That is exactly why some people get triggered. Because once those answers are recorded publicly, society can actually see how normalized victim blaming still is. And the irony is hilarious. This same creator getting offended over the question “asli mard kaun hain” constantly lectures women and feminists about how women should behave, dress, or live. Suddenly now labels are a problem? When men moral-police women daily, nobody asks, “asli aur nakli feminist jaisa kuch hota hai kya?”

Then comes the predictable “what about women selling content online?” argument. I’m not even defending that industry, but why is the entire burden always put on women while men consuming and funding it get a free pass? There’s unlimited free corn online already, yet many men still willingly pay for subscriptions. If demand exists, why is the conversation only about the women and never about the men creating the market?

And most importantly: the “short clothes cause h*rassment and SA” argument collapses the moment you look at reality. Countless women who faced h*rassment or SA were wearing school uniforms, sarees, salwar suits, jeans, hijabs, burqas, or completely ordinary clothing. Children get ass*ulted too, so do elderly women and animals. So how long are people going to keep pretending clothes are the root issue instead of confronting the mentality of entitlement, lack of respect and r-pe?

He always trashes feminism as the worst thing ever but gets triggered by the term "male ego". This reel was honestly a weak and defensive take. You can clearly see how triggered he got over the phrase “male ego,” instead of actually engaging with the issue.

Let’s be real, around 90% of acid attack victims in India are women. In most of those cases, the attackers are men. So how is calling it out as an issue tied to male ego suddenly “misusing female victims”? That doesn’t make sense. If you want to highlight cases where women were attackers, go ahead call that out as well. No one’s stopping you. But bringing up rare counter-examples just to dilute a larger, well-documented problem comes off as deflection, not awareness. And let’s not ignore a harsh reality: many acid attacks happen after rejection, when someone’s ego can’t handle a “no.” That doesn’t mean every man is like that, but dismissing the pattern entirely is dishonest. Women aren’t making this up; it comes from lived experiences, including cases where the perpetrator was someone known and trusted. That kind of betrayal affects how safe people feel in general.

What’s ironic is how easily people like him throw around the word “feminism” like it’s some kind of insult, but get offended the moment terms like “male ego” are used. Feminism, at its core, is simply about women having the same freedom of choice as men nothing more dramatic than that. And no, acknowledging male victims doesn’t require downplaying female victims. Both can be addressed without turning it into a competition. The point isn’t to attack men, it’s about acknowledging patterns and holding individuals accountable. The government or “society” doesn’t force someone to commit these crimes. At the end of the day, it’s personal responsibility.

There’s also a clear pattern of selective outrage. Where is this energy when men casually use abusive slurs for women? Why is that normalized, but calling out harmful behavior suddenly becomes “agenda”? It feels opportunistic calling out only what fits your narrative while ignoring the rest.

If the goal was awareness, he could have talked about male victims without dragging female victims into a comparison. Turning everything into a “what about the other side” argument just weakens the conversation instead of adding anything meaningful.

Imagine calling a random 18-year-old girl (teekhivani) “ch*pri” and “Honda Sherni” simply because she questioned a creepy sl*t-shamer friend of Thoolip (she follows him). She didn’t even use abusive language toward him. And the worst part? Thoolip jumped into the middle of it just to shame her. Seriously? How jobless do you have to be to go onto a creep m!sogynist’s page and start attacking an 18-year-old girl simply because you couldn’t counter her logic. How much lower can you go? Truly low-class behavior. She just couldn’t respond to an 18-year-old girl’s reasoning, so instead of replying with maturity or explaining your point like an elder sister, you chose to insult and degrade her. At this point, she is not any less misogynistic than people like Lakhshya Speaks. He made disgusting remarks about sleeping with Brahm!n women, and you’re right there too slut-shaming random women by calling them “Honda Sherni,” implying they sleep with M*slim men. So what exactly is the difference? What happened to all your principles? Lakhshya Speaks and Thoolip are 2 sides of the same coin.

Where was this same bold tone and mockery when women approached Thulip to call out a p*d*phile she was following and interacting with? Why does this energy only appear when it’s directed at women?

Is this what you call upholding dharma? Is this what being a proud Manuwadi woman looks like? And why use a degrading label like “Honda Sherni” for another Sanatani girl? Strange how respect and morality disappear the moment another woman disagrees with you.