u/Fun_Walk_4965

gpt-image-2 is out, anyone tested it yet?
▲ 11 r/GPT+3 crossposts

gpt-image-2 is out, anyone tested it yet?

tested GPT Image 2 on AtlasCloud.ai, its text rendering is way better now. scene understanding is also noticeably better. complex multi-object scenes with layered elements used to fall apart, now they hold together. response speed is solid, image-to-image editing feels more coherent than 1.5

But background detail still gives itself away, better than six months ago tho

during my tests, i found that for camera angle, it keeps defaulting to something slightly unconventional. not always bad, sometimes interesting, but not what I asked for, and the visuals look a bit off, the resolution seems kind of low

but overall, it's great, it might be as good as nb pro imo, or even better for some use cases.

u/Fun_Walk_4965 — 19 hours ago

Developer's guide to Seedance 2.0 API availability: what's open, what's locked, and what to use right now

u/Fun_Walk_4965 — 8 days ago

Is veo3.1 the most underrated model right now?

Recently using Veo 3.1 makes e‑com videos, and it feels weird how little people talk about it, for my need, it’s actually doing very well.

For people doing e‑com, the checklist for picking a model: video that doesn’t look fake at first glance, costs reasonable, and no need to record separate voiceovers. Veo 3.1 is pretty balanced on these points and, in practice, fits better than Kling, Runway Gen‑4 or Pika.

Image quality: skin, clothes, food details don’t have that plastic feel.

Color: very eye‑catching, Veo usually gives more vivid and bright colors with the same prompt.

Motion: movement looks reasonable and the background perspective holds up.

Overall Veo is quite even across motion, consistency and batch generation.

Kling: motion looks great, but it’s on the expensive side.

wan: follows prompts really well, but needs fine‑tuning before the texture and overall look feel right.

Others are either more on the “meme” side, or expect you to wire up a bunch of config or local setups before they’re useful.

Veo 3.1 is pretty friendly for e‑commerce for:

-First/last frame control + dual image reference, so brand characters and product IDs stay stable, which helps when you want a fixed IP.

-Built‑in audio.

-On the batch side, I built an n8n workflow and call Veo 3.1 through r/AtlasCloudAI, swapping in kling or seedance only when there’s a very specific look asked. For this kind of steady job, veo is pretty solid.

u/Fun_Walk_4965 — 11 days ago

seedance2.0 vs veo3.1, veo tried its best, seedance just built differently

https://reddit.com/link/1sjyv8r/video/06zducavivug1/player

https://reddit.com/link/1sjyv8r/video/28xq040wivug1/player

prompt: the woman is happily presenting her manicure in a vlog style

the first one is seedance2.0, second is veo3.1

run this on AtlasCloud.ai

actually the gap isn't huge.

seedance 2.0 delivers highly realistic output and the most consistent scene of all models, the skin texture and the light change, real real, also the style is the vlog style I requested

downsides: no 1080p yet, pricing isn't cheap, and generation is kind of slow, probably due to high demand. that said, face generation is mostly unrestricted now, though celebrity likenesses may need a few retries.

veo 3.1 has genuinely great composition, color, and lighting. everything looks well-designed

where it falls short is realism, veo is great but seedance is better, and veo's pricing is also nearly double seedance. also the filter is strange, the prompt is restricted until i replace 'the girl' with 'the woman' in prompt

if you want cinematic, visually polished footage with beautiful color, go with veo, it has a real edge there. if you need output that's realistic enough that people can't tell it's ai, seedance is the call. and since veo runs about twice the price, seedance is actually the better value if budget matters.

reddit.com
u/Fun_Walk_4965 — 12 days ago