u/Full-Reaction-2843

▲ 5 r/maths

So I came across a method recently and I'm not 100% sure if it's something people actually use or if I'm just overthinking it.

Let me explain how I understood it, might be wrong.

Say you're trying to find √9604 without a calculator.

First, look at the last digit which is 4. From what I know, only 2 and 8 give squares ending in 4 since 2² = 4 and 8² = 64. So the answer should end in either 2 or 8.

Then you ignore the last two digits and look at 96. Now you think: what number squared is closest to 96 without going over? 9² = 81 and 10² = 100 which is too big. So it should be 9-something.

At that point you combine it with the earlier step and get either 92 or 98. Then you just check quickly: 92² = 8464 and 98² = 9604. So √9604 = 98.

It actually worked faster than I expected when I tried a few examples.

Funny enough, I originally went down this rabbit hole because I didn't have my calculator nearby and started thinking about how people did calculations before all these tools were everywhere, and even now you see calculators built into everything from phones to random devices you find on sites like Alibaba.

Anyway, I'm still not sure. Is this a standard method or just a trick? Does it only work for certain numbers? Are there better or faster mental approaches for this kind of thing?

Also curious if people actually use stuff like this in exams or if it's just for fun.

Would appreciate any clarification, still learning

reddit.com
u/Full-Reaction-2843 — 17 days ago

We’re talking about thin layers of material. Tape. Films. Things that should, in theory, just stick, insulate, or protect. That’s it. But once you actually look closer, it’s like you’ve opened a door into an unnecessary level of complexity that most people never even think about.

Different adhesives, different heat resistance levels and different conductivity.And somehow, all of this matters just to make sure a device doesn’t fail later on.

And what frustrates me is how casually this is accepted.

Oh, just use the right type, What does that even mean when there are dozens of variations for almost the same function?

I was looking into this recently and saw discussions where people

reddit.com
u/Full-Reaction-2843 — 18 days ago