u/Flack_Bag

▲ 4.5k r/Anticonsumption+1 crossposts

The patent (US20160005270A1, “System and method for driving microtransactions in multiplayer video games”) was filed in 2015 and granted in 2017.

It describes a “microtransaction engine” that works in two stages.

First, it matches a junior player against a skilled “marquee” player using a promoted skin or weapon, so getting killed by it nudges them toward buying it.

Then, after the purchase, the system places the player in a gameplay session where that item is especially effective.

For example, putting a newly bought sniper rifle into a map well-suited for sniping, so the purchase feels rewarding and encourages future spending.

Activision claims it was an exploratory R&D patent that has never been implemented in a shipped game. Players have remained skeptical, especially around Warzone, but there’s no hard evidence confirming it’s live. Either way, the fact that someone sat down, designed this system, and successfully patented it is the asshole design.

u/Flack_Bag — 15 days ago
▲ 470 r/Anticonsumption+1 crossposts

>Colorado’s amendment is a blueprint. Senator Ball suggested similar changes for California’s version of this bill.

>That has not happened yet. It still threatens open source developers in the nation’s largest tech market. The same exclusion needs to apply there. Every state considering these copy-paste “protect the children” bills needs to understand: you cannot age-gate software without a centralized authority. Open source fundamentally breaks that model. That is the point.

foss-daily.org
u/ChamplooAttitude — 17 days ago