Accommodations PSA
There are many students who make assumptions when they see that someone is not in the exam room. Assumption 1 is that the person is getting an accommodation. Assumption 2 is that the accommodation is extra time. Assumption 3 is that the person didn’t need the accommodation, and Assumption 4 is that now the students in the exam room’s grades will suffer as a result.
As someone who has struggled with my vision for years, hearing people complain about the students with accommodations is extremely hurtful. The accommodations that I have help me be able to show how much work I put into preparing for the exam. And no, I am not in the top 10% of the class, and I have yet to CALI a single class. And I know that if and when I do, I will have earned it.
And before you say, “you might be an exception, majority of the accommodations are extra time and for people who don’t even need it.” Well, how do you know? Would you want someone to assume things about your needs? Not every disability is visible, and you shouldn’t be the one to determine whether someone needs an accommodation.
And, if you think it is so easy to get extra time, you can try to get it yourself. People try to put their best foot forward on law school exams, and you should, as well. You don’t need to limit yourself to the opportunities available.
Stop referring to accommodations as an advantage. Or better yet, stop complaining about the “accommodated students” altogether. I would gladly trade my condition out and not struggle as much as I do, and be able to take the exam in the room with everyone.
EDIT: I hear what everyone is saying. Perhaps the system is abused. But don't assume that someone is abusing the system just because they are not in the exam room.
EDIT: All you downvoters and mean commenters, please post the practice area and your location so that I know what to avoid.