CMV: Modern news media is more of a hinderence to good politics than a force for truth and transparency.
Just to be clear, I'm not making some sweeping statement that all news media is inherently bad. The statement id like critiqued is that... on net, most modern news media, which comprises of:
- 24 hour rolling news.
- hyper partisan papers and outlets.
- 'fast journalism'.
- click bait articles.
- news site social media channels.
Is a hindrance to decent politics.
Whilst in pockets great journalists are doing great work. The majority of content produced is a form of warped entertainment, more interested in outrage induced engagement, than in the truth seeking.
Much of it is either rushed and poorly researched, or outright lies and lies by omission.
The stories followed are not chosen by how important they are, but instead by how many clicks they can garner. Meaning much of the news cycle massively over index's on divisive stories that aren't that important, Vs real issues that may seem nuanced or slow burning.
An example would be the various soap operas in party politics, which can often become headline news, whilst serious global and economic issues are pushed to the back pages or not featured at all.
This system then incentivises politicians to focus time and energy on these non-issues, instead of the ones that are actually going to affect us or fix our countries.
The natural biproduct is a class of politicians being elected who are exclusively concerned with optics, and completely ill informed about the actual problems facing the economy, the environment, health systems, geopolitics etc. Instead they only speak in overly simplistic slogans and divisive rhetoric that the media landscape rewards.