For a while I kept following everything. Elections, protests, corruption scandals, another oligarch caught, unpunished. Repeat.
At some point I realized I wasn't informed. I was just... tired. And the tiredness wasn't from the news itself - it was from the feeling that none of it changes anything structural. New faces, same machine.
So I stopped asking "who should be in charge" and started asking "why does every system eventually end up the same."
I think the answer is boring and obvious once you see it: every government, no matter how it starts, runs on four monopolies - control over money, control over force, control over information, and control over what counts as "legitimate." Whoever holds those four things holds everything. The rest is theater.
What's interesting is that for the first time in history, technology is actually cracking some of those. Bitcoin cracked the money monopoly - not perfectly, not completely, but structurally. You can't freeze a private key. You can't inflate a fixed supply. That's new. That never existed before.
I've been thinking about what it would look like to apply that same logic to governance itself. Not a revolution. Not a party. Just -parallel systems that people use because they work better, until the old ones become irrelevant. Like the internet didn't defeat the post office. It just made it not matter.
I wrote it up. Anonymous, no organization behind it, free to copy.
I don't know if any of it is realistic. Maybe none of it is. But I got tired of waiting for someone else to think about it.