u/Exact-Schedule-2059

Running a project to improve interview quality across our hiring panel, which mostly consists of older and very experienced folks. Everyone has strong opinions but we're very light on data.

We track offer acceptance and early attrition but things move too slowly to coach anyone. In depserate need of leading indicators and things that acutally tell you whether an interviewer is conducting good interviews before it shows up in hire quality six months later.

Good day my digital brothers and sisters. I've been journaling pretty much my whole life with physical journals (proud of my decades-long personal library, even if certain years' spines make me wince just to look at them) and am wondering what the benefits of digital journals are?

What is it about sitting down and writing on a keyboard or phone that makes you prefer it over writing in a journal? Is it the convenience?

Coordinating interviews across a panel of five for a senior hire atm. Getting usable feedback from every interviewer before debrief is so hard... by the time I chase everyone down the whole process has moved on so much the key players are all out of the loop.

Have a scoring rubric but fillign it in properly takes 10 to 15 mins per int and noones doing it consistently. Is there a format that's actually reduced the feedback capture burn without hurting quality?

Wulbren Bongle. Telling Barcus he'd kill him if he ever saw him again was the last straw (after you finish the Steel Watch Foundry part). As soon as he turned around I smited him.

I'd really been resisting the entire game, and doing my best to be a good guy, but something inside me snapped when he threatened Barcus.

Maybe you could even justify it being a good guy move? He is a violent racist who openly threatened harm?