Nirma vs HPNLU (tier 3 dilemma, need honest advice)
hi im currently very confused between nirma and HPNLU, and I would really appreciate some honest guidance
From what I understand, I will most likely be getting HPNLU and other t3 nlus through vacancies, and Nirma is already an option I’m considering. Since both fall more or less in the tier-3 category, I want to make a practical decision rather than just going by the “NLU tag”.
I’ve spoken to multiple students from both colleges, and I’m getting very mixed opinions:
HPNLU:
•Placements are mostly off-campus right now
•Internships are largely self-driven
•NLU tag
•Mooting culture is active
•Location (Shimla) can make managing internships during the semester difficult
•Alumni base is still developing
Nirma:
•More established with a better alumni base (from what I saw on LinkedIn)
•Decent exposure (moots, debates, etc.)
•Internship support exists (they give contacts/leads but you still apply yourself)
•Faculty quality is inconsistent (some teachers are fresh LLM graduates)
•Placements are not very high: around 3–8 LPA (max)
•Management is strict/orthodox (more like school environment)
•Limited college life (no major fests etc.)
Mentors are also divided: Some are telling me to choose Nirma (more stable and established)Others are saying go for HPNLU because of the NLU tag
I’m honestly very confused. I understand that it depends on how much effort I put in, but I want to know which one gives a better platform for corporate law at this level.
My questions:
At this tier, what should matter more NLU tag or a more established college with better exposure/alumni?
Is HPNLU too risky right now because of placements and alumni being still developing?
Is Nirma a safer option, or are the placement concerns a big issue?
If you were in my place (aiming for corporate law), what would you choose?
I’d really appreciate honest, practical advice. Thanks :)