The idea is simple:
users submit anonymous reports about moderation experiences across Reddit communities, and the site aggregates patterns around things like:
- removals
- bans
- rule clarity
- openness
- moderation strictness
I’m intentionally trying to frame it as “reported patterns,” not objective truth. The platform includes confidence levels, report skew explanations, and disclaimers because I know moderation experiences are subjective and often emotionally biased.
Right now this is an early launch and I’m mainly looking for:
- UI/UX feedback
- trust concerns
- wording issues
- feature suggestions
- obvious flaws in the concept
- ideas for improving data quality over time
A few things I’m already aware of:
- low-report communities shouldn’t look authoritative
- people are more likely to report negative experiences than neutral ones
- moderation quality is difficult to quantify objectively
I’d genuinely appreciate thoughtful criticism before I start expanding the dataset further.
u/DistinctMachine2300 — 5 days ago