u/DifferenceKlutzy8804

Hello, I am a high school student who is currently attending to one of AAPS schools. Due to the absence of teacher contract and the ongoing negotiation that hasn't progressed a lot, students including me are experiencing a serious inconvenience. The teachers are unable to respond to student emails other than their strict working hours, students cannot hold clubs, and so on. When this matter arose a few months ago, we students treated it as a temporary event, and didn't really mind about it. However, as this became a prolonged issue, it started to harm students' academic futures and social welfare. To simply put, a legal conflict that students are not involved in are damaging students' lives.

As a student, I have a very limited access to information about this grave matter. All I know is that AAPS teachers lack a contract, and they are conflicting with the school board. I want to ask any additional information that can help me and the students understand more about what exactly is happening right now. I am planning to start a petition or send an essay of student perspective to the school board.

Just a simple question regarding the number of evidence on APUSH LEQ.

From what I know, for complexity point, you need four specific evidence in argument paragraphs. But other than that, I only need two?

So if I were to write only two evidence, would that be like this? :

Thesis : Blah blah due to A and B.

Argument #1 : Blah blah due to A because EVIDENCE 1

Argument #2 : Blah Blah due to B because EVIDENCE 2

Then, in that case of using two evidence in argument paragraphs, if I still want to get the complexity point, what will I have to do specifically? For example, I will have to make a counterargument in the last paragraph, which means I will still be using one or two more evidence on top of two argument evidence.. right?

So basically you actually need 3 to 4 evidence minimum?

I am currently working on an early college level research proposal.

The research objective is to answer the question : "Why did authoritarian regimes in East Asia achieve significant economic development while authoritarian regimes in Latin America failed to do so in the post-colonial era?".

What I want to know is a pretty minor issue but it just kinda hunts me because English is my second language. Is "post-colonial era" understandable? When I search it up, it seems like it is not a widely-used academic term. I can say 20th century but I feel like the word "post-colonial" highlights the sociopolitical similarity of the era between two regions.

HELP ME