u/Defiant-Vacation4465

Title: \[Open Source\] DTQEM v17.0 – A simple 2x2 Lindblad model for wave‑particle duality

Body:

Hi everyone,

I’ve been working on an open‑source numerical model (DTQEM v17.0) that simulates wave‑particle duality under continuous measurement.

The idea is simple:

\- The observer does NOT change the system’s energy (Hamiltonian is fixed).

\- The observer ONLY adds pure dephasing: L = sqrt(γ·E\_ext)·σ\_z.

This correctly reproduces the quantum Zeno effect (P=0.5 at E=1, coherence lost) and works for both massive particles and photons (e.g. red light, 650 nm).

I’m not asking you to believe anything.

👉 Just clone the repo, run the code, and see for yourself.

You lose nothing by trying.

If you have 5 minutes, give it a run.

I would really appreciate your honest feedback – positive or negative.

📌 Code & whitepaper:

https://zenodo.org/records/20162958

Thank you for your time.

Title: \[Open Source\] DTQEM v17.0 – A simple 2x2 Lindblad model for wave‑particle duality

Body:

Hi everyone,

I’ve been working on an open‑source numerical model (DTQEM v17.0) that simulates wave‑particle duality under continuous measurement.

The idea is simple:

\- The observer does NOT change the system’s energy (Hamiltonian is fixed).

\- The observer ONLY adds pure dephasing: L = sqrt(γ·E\_ext)·σ\_z.

This correctly reproduces the quantum Zeno effect (P=0.5 at E=1, coherence lost) and works for both massive particles and photons (e.g. red light, 650 nm).

I’m not asking you to believe anything.

👉 Just clone the repo, run the code, and see for yourself.

You lose nothing by trying.

If you have 5 minutes, give it a run.

I would really appreciate your honest feedback – positive or negative.

📌 Code & whitepaper:

https://zenodo.org/records/20162958

Thank you for your time.

Title: \[Open Source\] DTQEM v17.0 – A simple 2x2 Lindblad model for wave‑particle duality

Body:

Hi everyone,

I’ve been working on an open‑source numerical model (DTQEM v17.0) that simulates wave‑particle duality under continuous measurement.

The idea is simple:

\- The observer does NOT change the system’s energy (Hamiltonian is fixed).

\- The observer ONLY adds pure dephasing: L = sqrt(γ·E\_ext)·σ\_z.

This correctly reproduces the quantum Zeno effect (P=0.5 at E=1, coherence lost) and works for both massive particles and photons (e.g. red light, 650 nm).

I’m not asking you to believe anything.

👉 Just clone the repo, run the code, and see for yourself.

You lose nothing by trying.

If you have 5 minutes, give it a run.

I would really appreciate your honest feedback – positive or negative.

📌 Code & whitepaper:

https://zenodo.org/records/20162958

Thank you for your time.

Title: [Open Source] DTQEM v17.0 – A simple 2x2 Lindblad model for wave‑particle duality

Body:

Hi everyone,

I’ve been working on an open‑source numerical model (DTQEM v17.0) that simulates wave‑particle duality under continuous measurement.

The idea is simple:

- The observer does NOT change the system’s energy (Hamiltonian is fixed).

- The observer ONLY adds pure dephasing: L = sqrt(γ·E_ext)·σ_z.

This correctly reproduces the quantum Zeno effect (P=0.5 at E=1, coherence lost) and works for both massive particles and photons (e.g. red light, 650 nm).

I’m not asking you to believe anything.

👉 Just clone the repo, run the code, and see for yourself.

You lose nothing by trying.

If you have 5 minutes, give it a run.

I would really appreciate your honest feedback – positive or negative.

📌 Code & whitepaper:

https://zenodo.org/records/20162958

Thank you for your time.

[supprimé]

Title: [Open Source] DTQEM v17.0 – A simple 2x2 Lindblad model for wave‑particle duality

Body:

Hi everyone,

I’ve been working on an open‑source numerical model (DTQEM v17.0) that simulates wave‑particle duality under continuous measurement.

The idea is simple:

- The observer does NOT change the system’s energy (Hamiltonian is fixed).

- The observer ONLY adds pure dephasing: L = sqrt(γ·E_ext)·σ_z.

This correctly reproduces the quantum Zeno effect (P=0.5 at E=1, coherence lost) and works for both massive particles and photons (e.g. red light, 650 nm).

I’m not asking you to believe anything.

👉 Just clone the repo, run the code, and see for yourself.

You lose nothing by trying.

If you have 5 minutes, give it a run.

I would really appreciate your honest feedback – positive or negative.

📌 Code & whitepaper:

https://zenodo.org/records/20162958

Thank you for your time.

Title: [Open Source] DTQEM v17.0 – A simple 2x2 Lindblad model for wave‑particle duality

Body:

Hi everyone,

I’ve been working on an open‑source numerical model (DTQEM v17.0) that simulates wave‑particle duality under continuous measurement.

The idea is simple:

- The observer does NOT change the system’s energy (Hamiltonian is fixed).

- The observer ONLY adds pure dephasing: L = sqrt(γ·E_ext)·σ_z.

This correctly reproduces the quantum Zeno effect (P=0.5 at E=1, coherence lost) and works for both massive particles and photons (e.g. red light, 650 nm).

I’m not asking you to believe anything.

👉 Just clone the repo, run the code, and see for yourself.

You lose nothing by trying.

If you have 5 minutes, give it a run.

I would really appreciate your honest feedback – positive or negative.

📌 Code & whitepaper:

https://zenodo.org/records/20162958

Thank you for your time.