u/Deathpacito-01

Pattern that often gets repeated here

1. Someone posts Solarpunk content, often with "Aesthetics/Art" tag
2. People asking "How is this Solarpunk?" or otherwise criticizing the OP for how the content isn't Solarpunk enough, when the content's issues are relatively unobjectionable

What is this sort of criticism meant to accomplish? Are we trying to gatekeep? Is anything less than perfection now considered greenwashing? Or is it because ideological purism helps with farming clout? I doubt there needs to be more Leftist infighting than there already is.

Sequel to the first post: https://www.reddit.com/r/onednd/comments/1sd9ngq/whoever_wrote_the_new_villanous_options_ua_i_hope/

Whereas the first UA had great ideas/flavor but lacked balance, this second UA has apparently been very well received for the balance (aside from some weird venom monk feature wording/specifications).

In particular folks really seem to like the martial subclasses and how much oomph they have, and I feel that way too. I'm looking forward to finally getting impactful, strong new martial subclasses after some rather lackluster stuff like the Banneret fighter.