u/Datingquestion56798

I'm curious about the 2 year mark for a "relief from the judgment." on a plenary order one did not address. What happens if current counsel does not inform of the deadline and everyone is involved in hearings over an extension? These hearings started before the 2 year mark to be clear.

From looking at the legal summary site's this sounds like one of those options most lawyers will not mention, but it's probably your only chance in hell to get out of any restrictions.

I could see this being a legitimate problem someone has to deal with with how the law works around this and dealing with malicious exes. I could legitimately see breaking up with someone us having some strong words, this shit gets filed, and never dealing with it till right at the 2 year mark as something that seems fairly common. I think you'll probably lose it, but if you can win it's probably expensive.

Is this something where even if it's backed by hard science the judge might still reject it since he doesn't like changing decisions?

A lot of lawyers seem to be opposed to using the media to win cases. However, there's some situations where you have to humiliate the other party publicly to stand a chance at winning.

I'm guessing mostly stuff where you'd lose a hearing in the front of a judge. Stuff like protective orders with the other party filing to extend. But, the person they're extending against claims something like childhood abuse.

Basically, a Rob Reiner or Mendez twins situation; However, no murders have occurred, but a protective order exists to prevent it. There was just childhood abuse and a strained relationship between parents and child. Do you try this in the media to get that protective order dropped, by detailing the abuse claims publicly to the country?

My understanding is with protective orders even if no violations have ever occurred you're most likely going to lose the extension if the person still claims to fear you. So, how do you beat these other than a media trial since good, even perfect behavior, does not seem to be enough for a judge to not grant an extension?