Dismissed during extended probation after meeting HR-agreed objective criteria — any legal recourse?[England]
Looking for views on whether I have any employment law options here.
What happened:
Joined a company \~10 months ago.
Manager had a grudge from day one — CPO had to give exception to him on salary, and he assumed I'd join within 2 weeks without checking my notice period.
First 3 months: no performance issues raised
He then initiated a mid-probation check-in that no other employee was subject to, citing vague concerns based on his own preconceptions.
He then extended my probation by 3 months.
I worked with HR to establish clear, objective, written criteria for passing probation.
Delivered against all criteria; last negative feedback was 4 months ago.
Since then, only positive feedback and assurances I was on track.
Now suddenly dismissed — no new performance concerns raised.
Why this feels legally significant:
I was singled out with a process no other employee faced.
HR-agreed objective criteria were met.
Dismissal came despite sustained positive feedback and no new issues.
Questions:
Does being singled out for a probation process not applied to others constitute differential/discriminatory treatment?
Can I argue the dismissal was procedurally unfair even under 2 years service, given HR set objective criteria I demonstrably met?
Any value in a Subject Access Request (SAR) to obtain internal communications before deciding next steps?
I understand unfair dismissal rights typically vest at 2 years, but I'm wondering if there's anything here around wrongful dismissal, discrimination, or breach of implied contractual terms.