Is this enough evidence for collusion full update
Here are the facts:
\-screenshot 1 in sleeper is my league
\-team 1 getting left side, team 2 getting right side
\-in screenshot 1 team 2 also added after members lashed out that a “29 1st and more picks” would be included. We are mid 26 so 29 is not available to trade.
\-there is no initial veto but is uproar (now is where I think it might be same person so do more digging)
\-screenshot 2 is another team 1 and 2 made ina different 10T SF league. This is a horrible trade especially a 10 man.
\-team 2 is new account created January that is only in 4 leagues. All 4 are orphans joined all in 2026 with team 1 being in all of them previously.
\-team 1 and 2 use same language in message to show draft year. Something I noticed in sleeper dm they would add ‘ after year like 27’. Both times with ‘ after year and no 20 in front. Have evidence to show cases of this.
The fact this trade of feeding the same account happened in another league already in 2026 has me feeling sick. I am thinking of showing this evidence to league and then voting on if to remove both members. I am planning on reversing trade on standpoint we are only trading what is available in sleeper. No conditionals or future picks that aren’t tangible currently in sleeper at time of trade will be allowed.
Thoughts and advice on next steps?
This has got to be my worst day ever dealing with commish bs.