Considering starting a solo employment law practice. I'm a bit concerned about whether there's enough business for an employee side practice (on one hand I've heard clients say they have been unable to find an employee side lawyer, but I have also had lawyers tell me there's not enough business to just do employee side employment law).
Also wondering how solos compete against large employee side firms with huge marketing budgets.
Wondering what your favorite part about being a lawyer is.
I'd say just the relative ease with which you can work for yourself and work remotely (depending on practice area). Most of the people I know don't have realistically easy options to go start working for themselves.
So I thought there was no exam requirement if you're licensed in a reciprocating province (given the National Mobility Agreement, clause 33: https://flsc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/National-Mobility-Agreement-2013.pdf).
However, this is BC's FAQ on Transferring to BC: https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/getContentAsset/8b7b8837-1449-471e-9aa3-5b79daa1f035/dfc3d011-8f63-43f6-9ed8-4b444333a1d0/transfer-info?language=en-CA
The above PDF says:
Transfer to BC from a reciprocating jurisdiction under the National Mobility Agreement or the Territorial Mobility Agreement: Depending on a lawyer's recent practice experience, he or she may be eligible to transfer to BC from a reciprocating jurisdiction under Rule 2-81 and the National Mobility Agreement or the Territorial Mobility Agreement on fulfilling a prescribed reading requirement.
And the transfer application form for BC (https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/getContentAsset/42285088-08fc-4be4-943f-86721658c3ff/dfc3d011-8f63-43f6-9ed8-4b444333a1d0/transfer-app?language=en-CA) says:
Important: Applicants who have not engaged in the practice of law for more than three years during the five-year period immediately preceding the date of this application will be required to write the qualification examinations. Applicants who have not engaged in the practice of law for more than seven years will be referred to the Credentials Committee. In this case, the Committee has the discretion to impose conditions on admission, such as re-articling, pursuant to Law Society Rule 2-79.
So the above two excerpts seem to impose a licensing requirement, even if you're transferring from a reciprocating province. Although given other strong language which seems to contradict the above, I'm not sure.
Yet the BC FAQ on Transferring to BC includes Rule 2-81 that says:
(2) An applicant under this rule must fulfill all of the requirements in Rule 2-79 [Transfer from another Canadian jurisdiction] for call and admission on transfer from another Canadian jurisdiction, except that he or she need not pass any transfer examination.
The National Mobility Agreement itself says under clause 33:
Before admitting as a member a lawyer qualified under clause 32, a governing body will not require the lawyer to pass a transfer examination or other examination, but may require the lawyer to do all of the following:
(a) provide certificates of standing from all Canadian and foreign governing
bodies of which the lawyer is or has been a member;
(b) disclose criminal and disciplinary records in any jurisdiction;
(c) consent to access by the governing body to the lawyer’s regulatory files of
all governing bodies of which the lawyer is a member, whether in Canada
or elsewhere; and
(d) certify that he or she has reviewed all of the materials reasonably required
by the governing body.
So does BC actually require an exam if you don't have sufficient recent experience even if you're licensed and entitled to practice in a reciprocating province?