u/Cereal_Yapper

Oh this isn't just on how this is a bad theory, but on how this is a bad video

Start to 7 minutes (proving what is already proven)

This 27 minute video is basically just 20 minutes because the first 7 minutes is used to prove Golden Freddy is Toyshnk, as if their isn't a cutscene that acts as a giant I AM TOYSHNK sign Goldem Freddy has when you beat 50/20 mode. So yeah that was pointless

Minute 7-9

Right before his big statement, he first spends it debating that that the Spirit inside Golden Freddy is a guy, which i have to unfortunately agree with, but this also serves as an indirect retcon of Cassidy that everyone does to remove Cassidy as a candidate, like its not more likely nowadays that Cassidy is a guy (ie the two movies showing him as a guy), but thats not the point of the video

Minute 9- The rest of the video

And their it is, BVToyshnk, probably the worst unironic Toyshnk theory. First, let's go by a point by point basis

why would Cassidy haunt Micheal?

Either she didn't or she did it to get revenge for BV, not once did he show actual evidence that would prove BV would even do this, hell, the only time we see a comfired spirit giving someone dreams, it was Cassidy to Micheal. So yes Golden Freddy is associated to dreams, but the onlu direct connection involves Cassidy, not BV, excluding association he has little to do with dreams other than arguing he's the night player of fnaf 4, which he likely isn't

"The rooms of fnaf 4 heavily hints that BV death was orchestrated"

No, it shows the rooms in fnaf 4 are test sites, one which if meant for BV should now go unused as their is Noone meant for it. Even the, he also states that William has no reason to DO any of this other than hes just evil and what is essentially headcanon, more accurately it was meant to punish Micheal or in an attempt to recreate the circumstances of BV death to see if he could recreate it, because we know Fredbear's was a real location, so what else could close it down, Charlie's death is gonna do it, and the Multiple simultaneous Springlock failures was about showing why the Springlock suits stopped being used.

"Fredbear's voiceline about stuffing you to a suit is a callback to the bite of 83"

Dude the fucking Strech of doom and despair here, getting your head put in fredbears mouth is not the same as being shoved into a suit, and even then they aren't even the only person to be put into a fredbear suit, Andrew and Cassidy are also both shoved into the same Fredbear suit, and this time they are properly shoved in.

"OMC being the same in both UCN and Fnaf world proves it has to be Toyshnk"

Uh no, it proves it has to be the same entity, and we know for a fact whoever is playing as the bear CAN'T be Toyshnk, as who the hell would be torturing Afton in the background. This itself doesn't disprove BVToyshnk, but is shows that he can either be Toyshnk or the Bear, no double dipping.

And now, we arrive onto the only good pieces of evidence he brought up, Bear of Vengence

As he himself stated, BV, Gregory, and David are all very closely linked storywise via repetition, and both David and Gregory have been shown with the image of being on a hill, under a tree, so logically the bear under the tree overlooking a hill has to be related in some way no? He even brings up Gravevictim and the three shadow Ballon boys under the tree as evidence. But then he becomes his own undoing, as Toy Chics during her cutscenes, who is often used to represent William Afton, is sitting under a tree, which is on a hill, and although BV, David, and Gregory most definitely have some connection, this shows the tree, is not one strictly meant for them, and yeah, the birthday thing helps resolidify it, but by your admission, Foxy and Mangle are highly debatable on who they are, so until we get conformation on who they are, BVTOYSHNK stays a unproven theory

Please watch the video, I skipped over some small things.

Also ping TDreads i dont know his u /

Scythe Glazers after two whole wins