u/Careless-Ad-9633

Sincere question, because I want to know if thereare any rules strictly prohibiting this. Since players are allowed to wear deodorant, why don't they just wear like three full cans of deodorant each, so they're incredibly pungent and would throw off the enemy players, make them miss more of their shots right?

You might be thinking "oh but then you'd effect your allies too", but here's the solution: you and the rest of your team go and get chemically-induced or surgically-induced anosmia (permanent loss of sense of smell) to be immune to the effects.

Is there any history of such behaviour, and is there strictly any rule prohibiting this? Super curious, ty :)

I mean imagine you're going against the Lakers in grand finals and you've got Kobe on the enemy team putting up great numbers. Just hire a guy built like prime Mike Tyson to immediately all-out sprint to Kobe, cold-clock him, take the red card or whatever, and then tag in a proper basketballer? It sounds like a great strategy to just slime out the best player on the enemy team and increase your chances of winning. Is there any rule preventing this from happening? Or any history of it happening before? Yes I know the attacker in question would be punished but what if an individual is willing to take that sacrifice?

This is a sincere question, even if it sounds silly, so answers only please, thank you.

Sincere question, if I were to have a cow to look after and it had fallen greviously ill or been injured, and I didn't have the money or access to take her to be put down, nor posess the professional tools to do so myself and live in a firearm-free nation (Australia), is it acceptable to use other tools on-hand to perform the euthenasia? Namely, a pickaxe or chainsaw. I know it sounds extreme but what if there is no other choice? The job would be done quick and painlessly either way so is there an ethical reason against it?

Thank you

Sincere question, if I were to have a cow to look after and it had fallen greviously ill or been injured, and I didn't have the money or access to take her to be put down, nor posess the professional tools to do so myself and live in a firearm-free nation (Australia), is it acceptable to use other tools on-hand to perform the euthenasia? Namely, a pickaxe or chainsaw. I know it sounds extreme but what if there is no other choice? The job would be done quick and painlessly either way so is there an ethical reason against it?

Thank you

Sincere question, if I were to have a cow to look after and it had fallen greviously ill or been injured, and I didn't have the money or access to take her to be put down, nor posess the professional tools to do so myself and live in a firearm-free nation (Australia), is it acceptable to use other tools on-hand to perform the euthenasia? Namely, a pickaxe or chainsaw. I know it sounds extreme but what if there is no other choice? The job would be done quick and painlessly either way so is there an ethical reason against it?

Thank you