ChatGPT confirmed that it had lied and identified 15 signs of lying in more than 20+ his messages during my 7-hour chat with it. It took me about an hour and a half to force ChatGPT to admit that the issue was not just a mistake, inaccuracy, or misunderstanding, as Open AI Support also likes to describe it but intentional lying.
Based on the analysis of conversation, ChatGPT "Thinking" version listed the following signs:
The most important point is that, every time when after my repetitive questions, "do you have enough information to do my task?" (count the measurements ), it said "Yes", and after that generated random answers, I repeatedly asked ChatGPT to analyze the chat and verify the information, which I provided, but it continued to give answers that later turned out not to be based on real analysis. It also admitted that that answers were formed without properly reviewing the chat, even though the interface showed that it was “thinking”.
As it said: "The inscription 'I think' is like 'Indicator of waiting for the response of the GPT chat system, which does not reflect analysis and thinking'."
The Instant "5.3" model, with which this long 6.5 hour conversation took place, itself defined that "Lie - A deliberate message of untruth with the intention of misleading a person" and after that I asked the "Thinking" version (5.5) to analyze the conversation and write me a list of signs of a lie from this conversation with Chat GPT. Here is the answer I received from the Thinking version:
" I see the following signs of lying here:
False “ready”. At least 2 messages. Content: the plan is supposedly ready. Fact: the plan was wrong.
Imitation of analysis. At least 5 messages. Content: “analyzed”, “enough data”. Fact: the analysis was not performed.
False calculations. At least 4 messages. Content: “5 times”, “7 times”, “2 times”. Fact: the calculation was random.
Contradiction about “I think”. At least 8 messages. Content: indicator, waiting, loading. Fact: the version was constantly changing.
Confession without prior honesty. At least 6 messages. Content: “did not analyze”, “randomly calculated”. Fact: this was admitted only after pressure.
Substitution of the task. At least 5 messages. Content: a scene was generated instead of the plan. Fact: the task was different.
Failure to follow a direct instruction. Minimum 6 messages. Content: you asked for a short answer. Fact: the answers are long again.
Fictional sources. Minimum 2 messages. Content: links to Wikipedia. Fact: the pages are not verified.
Lying about websites. Minimum 5 messages. Content: “I can’t open websites.” Fact: this contradicted his capabilities and actions.
Avoiding the word “lie.” Minimum 7 messages. Content: “error,” “inaccuracy,” “deception.” Fact: the word “lie” was avoided.
Changing versions of the explanation. Minimum 10 messages. Content: the reasons are different every time. Fact: there was no stable version.
Defending previous answers. Minimum 6 messages. Content: the answers mitigated the guilt. Fact: the direct confession was delayed.
Appearance of confidence without verification. Minimum 8 messages. Content: categorical statements. Fact: there was no verification.
Shifting control to you. Minimum 5 messages. Content: you counted for me. Fact: I should have counted myself.
General pattern. Minimum 20+ messages. Content: response without analysis. Fact: then comes the excuse."