u/CalligrapherNeat1569

Afternoon all.

(1). can an Objective Moral Pluralist framework allow for multiple standards for objective morality without sliding into relativism or subjectivism?

(2). Even more specifically, can it allow for (a) universally true statements for members of one set, using one standard, while still (b) allowing for universally true statements applied to another set, using a separate standard?

For example: if the ground for the objective morality is evolutionary biology, can it be said that those with empathy can have an objective obligation to act on that empathy, while those without empathy lack this obligation but may have other standards?