u/CalligrapherCurrent4

I want to make an Appendix, in the interview with:

1. Client details

2. Background

3. Client instructions

However, I am aware that this might be a lot to write, so can I edit this 'Appendix' after the interview, filling in the gaps of whatever I ran out of time to include.

I do not want to spend too much time in the interview writing background info out for example. So couldn't I make the heading first and then fill in any missing details while writing the attendance note?

Thank you!

Hey guys,

Just wondering how 'perfect' the InhouseW advocacy mock answers are.

I've gone through a few, it seems there is a great deal of information in the background facts section, but the submissions themselves seem fairly thin. Is this the correct approach? I have been only keeping the facts brief but the submissions themselves detailed.

Would appreciate your help and insight!

Should we prepare for being prosecution as hard as we prepare for being the defence? Or can we get away with preparing for that somewhat less.

Is there a difference in wording for No case to answer submissions? Do we still need to introduce ourselves, as the judge would know who we are already?

Also, should we still give a background of facts?

Thank you!

Is it necessary? Thanks in advance!