Blake Lively and her fans weaponise white feminism while also upholding patriarchy to avoid responsibility and accountability
​
Hi all!! I watched this tiktok last night and thought it would be apt to share it here as well!
I have been following this creator for a while now, she mainly speaks about intersectional feminism. She's also posted a few critiques on Miss Lively, her use of feminism to avoid responsibility and the social community's response to Blake's allegations/lies.
I know many of us in this sub are already aware of what this creator is saying, but I truly think it's valuable to watch and listen to what she's analysing. I also think Blake supporters need to watch this, listen very closely. You may think you're supporting feminism by supporting a woman at face value, but it's actually damaging to ignore the very holes in Blake's "campaign" to destroy an innocent man. Because not only is she destroying innocence, she's weaponising white feminism while also upholding patriarchy to achieve whatever she set out to achieve, selfishly. I've also said this from the beginning, that women are allowed to be god awful people. Feminism allows that, but it doesn't absolve you of any accountability for your actions. Which is what Blake and her cronies are promoting.
Here is a summary of the video (thanks to Mysterio!) for those who prefer to read!
White feminism is being used to defend Blake Lively, and it's dangerous for all women. White feminism isn't about the race of the person involved — it's about the framework being applied. It has five core tenets:
Ignores intersectionality: doesn't account for power dynamics beyond gender
Gives women a flawed moral immunity by assuming that surely women can't cause harm under patriarchy
Criticism equals misogyny: any scrutiny gets you labeled a misogynist
More anti-man than pro-woman, thereby still centering men
White female victimhood is the ultimate shield
Comparing Blake Lively to Amber Heard is a false equivalence. Amber Heard was confirmed by the court as a credible victim of domestic violence whose reputation was destroyed by a smear campaign. Blake Lively's situation is different; here 10 of her 13 claims were dismissed. Justin Baldoni was removed from the lawsuit, and she settled before trial, forfeiting her chance to prove retaliation. Hiring the same PR firm as Johnny Depp isn't a smoking gun; it's lazy analysis.
The intersectional reality is that Blake Lively held far more power on that set. She's A-list, was a credited producer, is married to Ryan Reynolds, and is friends with Taylor Swift. A powerless woman couldn't star in an adaptation of a book she never read, have her own cut of the film, or relegate the director to the basement at the premiere.
As for the "smear campaign," no PR firm was needed. The public turned on Blake Lively on their own after watching her promote cocktails and hair care alongside a domestic violence film, branding it as a fun girls' night movie. Women in the audience made up their own minds in real time. But white feminism can't grant the audience that agency; it has to be a conspiracy, because women supposedly can't cause harm.
Real feminism protects all women but doesn't shield them from accountability. White feminism only protects the "right" women from consequences. It's not misogynist to dislike a woman. Let women be unlikable.