Court ruled in their favor by a narrow 3–2 majority.
But before we frame this as a clear victory… it’s worth pausing.
Honestly, I don’t even mind that they won.
Because if the outcome had gone the other way, we all know exactly what the narrative would be right now:
“Persecution.”
“Proof we are God’s people.”
“Just like Jesus.”
And that shuts down thinking. Instantly.
This way? It’s different.
This outcome might actually create something we rarely get: space for reflection.
Members aren’t immediately pushed into defensive mode. There’s no urgent need to “protect the truth” against outside attack. And that matters — because when people aren’t defending, they’re more open to thinking. (I know, not their strongest side.)
So maybe this is an opportunity!
If you have family or friends still inside, this could be one of the best moments to gently start a conversation — not by attacking, but by asking questions.
For example:
- Why do you think the decision wasn’t unanimous? What did the two dissenting judges see differently?
- Do you personally agree that shunning after someone leaves is not a form of pressure?
- If losing your entire social network isn’t pressure, what would qualify as pressure?
- Do you think someone raised in the organization has the same “free choice” to leave as someone who joined as an adult?
- Should a religious practice be beyond criticism simply because it’s based on belief?
- Where should the line be between religious freedom and individual rights?
These aren’t accusations. They’re thinking prompts.
And that’s the key: this moment isn’t about “winning” or “losing” — it’s about opening doors that are usually closed.
So to the exJW community: don’t get discouraged!
This is not some decisive, crushing victory for the organization. A 3–2 ruling is basically the definition of controversial. Even at the highest level, there was serious disagreement about whether these practices cross a line.
That alone says a lot.
And more importantly: this situation might actually help us achieve something real — better, more honest conversations with the people we care about.
Sometimes, the absence of conflict is what finally allows truth to be heard.