
LVFN - I didn't hear no bell
TLDR
- Q3 earnings was bad, but not disastrous. missed modestly across the board: revenue $43.7M vs $45-50M expected, EPS $0.12 vs $0.16, guidance lower
- BUT they raised the dividend 11% and cash increased from $10.2M to $12.5M.
- Stock gapped down $5 but has been extremely flat for the entire day, signaling a strong buy wall either from the company’s buyback program, Sudbury, or longs in general AND shorts are very hesitant of trying to break that wall
- Short data still extreme after earnings. CTB on average is around 96% today on new borrows. Availability at 2%. SI barely changed
- So? The binary earnings squeeze is no more, but a mild-moderate rebound seems likely and a slower squeeze is possible over the next few weeks if the $5 floor holds. Shorts paying 90% APR cannot wait long
Diving into the short data
Going into earnings, the data looked like this:
Those numbers were already extreme. You'd expect bears to take profits, SI and CTB to drop, and higher availability after the bad call. But based on the live data that didn’t happen. Today CTB actually doubled
- CTB Average today: 94.2%
- CTB Max today: 266.7% lmao
- Only 54k shares covered
So I’m left wondering what the shorts are thinking. If they’re willing to enter at 90-260% APR they have a lot of conviction the stock will lower a lot immediately after earnings over the next few weeks. They need about a 10%+ further drop in 30 days just to cover the interest. So shorts really believe the stock has a lot more downside, or they know something we don’t. And since not a lot of shorts were covered, the existing shorts think so too.
Price action
You would think after a bad earnings on a stock that also has a crapton of shorts would be very volatile, but for most of the day, it moved only for 1-2 cents. I don’t think I’ve ever seen any other stock movements as flat as LFVN today, even on 3x avg volume. Whatever the reason, there's clearly demand at $5 and shorts can't easily push lower without first eating through that demand.
So is the squeeze still possible?
Yes, but with different mechanics. There’s no more binary catalyst but the CTB by itself is so insane that it can do most of the work. Imagine paying a 90-200% APR on your credit card. Fk that, at least us poors have BNPL. Unless these shorts are degenerate individuals, they can’t really justify holding that position on a managed fund for that long. So if the price holds steady, at the very least our bags get lighter as they unwind, even without a squeeze. And if it does squeeze, it probably won’t be as explosive, but rather happen over a few weeks. Also, if CTB stays elevated, the earlier shorts who got in a "low" interest rate, will eventually get their CTB re-rated higher.
What needs to happen for this to work
- $5 floor needs to hold. If it gets to 4-4.50 from longs selling, probably no squeeze
- CTB needs to stay high
- Availability needs to stay low.
- No bad news drops
The play, if you’re not already traumatized
- Buy June calls. $5 is safer than $7.5 since the price could just slowly rise over a longer period of time
- Sell CSPs or CCs
- Don’t enter. The stock is still an MLM company that had bad earnings
I got lucky and sold some calls and DITM CCs yesterday so I’m not bleeding too bad and so I double-downed on June calls. I'm eager to see if shorts are clowns for paying 100% interest to short or me for doubling-down. Sorry for those that got burned, gl to those that enter.
NFA
Edit: LFVN in title