"The primary reason the Israeli-Palestinian conflict feels impossible to resolve is that we are using a distorted, Western-centric lens to view a Middle Eastern tribal reality. By labeling Jews as 'European colonizers,' we are essentially prioritizing the location of a people's exile over the location of their origin. Judaism is not just a faith; it is the portable culture of the Judean tribe. Whether a family was 'parked' in Poland, Morocco, or Yemen, their DNA, language, and indigenous connection to the land of Israel remained the same. Treating Zionism as a 'foreign invasion' is a Diaspora-era distortion that erases 3,000 years of continuity. If we want to move toward peace, we must stop viewing the return of a displaced indigenous people as a colonial act and start seeing it as the ultimate decolonization movement."
Edit, I wanted to add this as people address things that aren't very related: "Critiquing the actions of a modern state does not invalidate the indigenous status of its people; both Jews and Palestinians have deep, ancient roots in this land and the right to exist upon it. Furthermore, the 'Canaanite' argument is a distraction, as genetic continuity shows that both groups share that Levantine ancestry—meaning neither is 'foreign' to the region. This isn't about 'who was their first' in a prehistoric sense but about the right of a displaced tribe to return to its specific cultural and historical source."
Also claims about Europeans going back to certain areas, do not apply here, every case is examined differently. Any africa claims are also unhelpful. People who left africa dont have a cultural connection to that land. Anybody people who left a region and now doesn't relate with the cultural identity of that land gave up his right, regardless of genetic composition.