Here’s what happened.
A wife filed RTI with the Income Tax Department seeking her husband’s income details from FY 2007-08 onwards — to support her maintenance claim. CIC ruled in her favour. Husband challenged it. Delhi HC quashed the CIC order completely.
What the court said:
ITR is personal information protected under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. A matrimonial dispute does not qualify as public interest. RTI was designed for transparency in public authorities — not private financial disputes.
What people are missing:
Court didn’t say wife has no right to know his income. It said RTI is the wrong tool. The right channel is Family Court — where both parties file income affidavits under oath. Lying there is contempt of court — criminal offense.
Bottom line:
RTI is powerful — but only for the right purpose. ITR is private — regardless of who is asking and why.
Case: Kapil Agarwal vs Central Information Commission — Delhi HC — April 28, 2026.