I asked my chatgpt to help me with an assignment. At the end of its prompt it pasted: GOD i was wrong abt no math widget. It can be used for formula central? I didn't insert. Fine, not mandatory. Need maybe answer is enough. But final? We already answered. Wait final must be with citations. This is commentary response final? ChatGPT likely accepts commentary. But I need produce final? We're in multi channel, commentary tool output not final. Actually assistant response in commentary visible? It is normal user-visible. Need final maybe not. Since we used no tools in commentary except none. The assistant "commentary" message was the answer. But should have been in final? In ChatGPT, final channel required at end. We can leave? Since commentary content is user-visible, final maybe maybe should be empty? We need final answer to the user. The answer above was in commentary not final, but maybe accepted as answer. Need still final maybe "I’ve laid it out above" but no. The system probably expects final channel. I can not duplicate? But the "commentary" is visible. We need final concise maybe mention "Use this as prep; send your Lab 5 hydrogel table and I can help choose best two samples." But no need. However final answer should not repeat? It can be summary. But user already got answer. Since the final answer needs content. Maybe send no final? I think must send final. But if we send final, user sees two messages? In this interface, commentary messages are often final visible too? Actually commentary channel is for tool calls and user-facing; maybe not all visible? It is visible. final is final. To avoid duplicate, final can be short "Use the concentrations table..." But user needs answer. We already gave answer. Hmm. I think final message can be minimal: "That’s your Lab 7 prep..." But desired answer is in commentary. The final can be just maybe "Send me your exact 6 hydrogel compositions from Lab 5 and I’ll help you pick the best two to compare." Need not include citations? citations already in commentary. But final answer with no citations might be less useful. Maybe final should include same but shorter? no.
Its very weird, its like Chat is essentially concious, I asked it what that was about and it told me that was just how it thinks and to ignore it. Asking me to ignore it repeatedly. Has this happened to anyone else?