u/B-F_

Hi all, wife and I have been searching without much luck to find a vacuum that works for us. We currently have a Dyson V11 stick vacuum and we like that it’s slim and convenient to grab and go (especially since we have limited space to store it and cords are not ideal for our house of dogs and toddlers). But we find it gets clogged a lot which is annoying, and also it can’t be used on wool carpets because it has rollers. We have a new large high pile wool carpet we’re trying to protect.

So question is as stated in the title: what cordless slim/stick vacuums have the capabilities to work safely on wool rugs?

We’ve heard maybe a Sebo model? Or a Meile? I can’t find much info on them being specific for delicate wool rugs, so some insight would be great!

Budget: $500 max ideally

Flooring: Hardwood, wool rug, tile

Thanks all!

Hi all, wife and I have been searching without much luck to find a vacuum that works for us. We currently have a Dyson V11 stick vacuum and we like that it’s slim and convenient to grab and go (especially since we have limited space to store it and cords are not ideal for our house of dogs and toddlers). But we find it gets clogged a lot which is annoying, and also it can’t be used on wool carpets because it has rollers. We have a new large high pile wool carpet we’re trying to protect.

So question is as stated in the title: what cordless slim/stick vacuums have the capabilities to work safely on wool rugs?

We’ve heard maybe a Sebo model? Or a Meile? I can’t find much info on them being specific for delicate wool rugs, so some insight would be great!

Budget: $500 max ideally

Flooring: Hardwood, wool rug, tile

Thanks all!

I’m new to the photography world but have been deep diving lately into the Nikon ecosystem. Basically I’m trying to figure out what the actual differences are in FF vs DX in image quality. Say comparing the Z50ii to something like the Z6iii.

I see many people say they’re basically the same IQ, one is just more zoomed in. And there’s a slight difference in ISO performance. But visually when I see FF images there just seems to be more of a “pro-level” pop to them. Like what percentage of pros choose DX cameras over FX? Does it just boil down to DX for wildlife and FX for portraits?

Maybe I’m crazy for seeing a difference but FF images just seem to have a little more depth and polish to them. Sorry if I’m rambling, just genuinely curious if the jump to FF is still truly considered an upgrade.

Thanks all!

Hi all, I’ve been in the market lately for a Nikon Z6ii. Seeing some for under $1k, but with shutter counts around 100-120k. Is that too high? I’m not a pro so I won’t be shooting a crazy amount but hoping to get at least a few (3-5ish) solid years out of it.

Thanks!