This person is an author and claims to be a lawyer in Threads. How is it possible for someone to state this publicly and uncontested? The Lively bias is delusional. How is this person concluding this from the statement. I truly cannot understand it.
There are thousands of likes on this response. Almost every news article I read and obvs all the journey that I’ve been here with all the law tubers completely contradicts this take. Can someone explain to me how can someone in their right mind look at the evidence the final joint statement on the settlement, and completely attribute a win to Lively?
With a gutted case! Without Justin Baldoni even being a party on the final surviving counts!??
Also, why is nobody in the comments able to present a more realistic take on the situation. Community notes are not even allowed.