I kept seeing the same advice in here: build fast, ship fast, validate.
So I did that… and still ended up with something nobody really cared about.
What finally changed things was looking at where the actual frustration was.
I went through a bunch of landlord threads and realized the problem isn’t “logging maintenance requests.”
It’s everything after that:
- Vendors not responding
- No-shows
- Chasing people for updates
- Constant follow-ups
So I built a simple MVP called TenantTrack focused on that part instead.
Basic flow:
- Tenant submits request (QR code or form)
- Landlord gets it in a dashboard
- Vendor gets a “magic link” (no login)
- They accept/decline + update status
- If they don’t respond, it escalates or suggests another vendor
Still early, but the goal is:
Reduce the back-and-forth and make vendor coordination less chaotic.
I’m not pretending it’s perfect — just trying to solve a very specific pain point better than generic “property management” tools.
If you’ve dealt with maintenance/vendor issues (landlords, contractors, etc.), I’d actually value your honest feedback.
What feels unnecessary?
What’s missing?
Guthub: https://github.com/chrismayeaux23-ai/TenantTrack/blob/main/README.md