Login

u/Admirable_Aside_4824

▲ 11 r/verticalfarming

Trying to understand something very specific in vertical farm operations:

Airflow and its impact on crop performance.

In theory, everything looks fine:

- temperature is within range

- humidity looks stable

- dashboards show no obvious issue

But crops still underperform.

In many cases, the real issue turns out to be:

→ poor air movement around the canopy

→ uneven VPD distribution

→ boundary layer not being managed

So I’m curious:

How do you actually evaluate airflow in your facility?

And more importantly:

Can you reliably connect airflow issues to crop outcomes?

Would appreciate real operational insights.

u/Admirable_Aside_4824 — 19 days ago
▲ 9 r/verticalfarming

Something I keep noticing:

Most vertical farms have a lot of data.

But when performance drops (yield / energy / climate stability), it’s still hard to answer:

“What exactly happened?”

Not just detecting anomalies — but explaining:

- when it started

- what changed

- which system was involved

- whether the conclusion is reliable

In practice, is this something you can actually do today?

Or is it still mostly:

- looking at charts

- discussing with the team

- making best guesses

Trying to understand if this is a real gap, or just my impression.

reddit.com
u/Admirable_Aside_4824 — 21 days ago
▲ 5 r/verticalfarming

I’m doing research on how vertical farms and CEA operators diagnose operational problems.

Not trying to sell anything here — I’m trying to understand the real workflow.

For farms running LEDs, HVAC/dehumidification, fertigation, pumps, and sensors:

When energy use goes up, yield drops, or climate stability gets worse, how do you actually figure out what caused it?

Do you mostly rely on:

  1. OEM dashboards

  2. Excel / manual logs

  3. SCADA / BMS exports

  4. grower experience

  5. energy bills

  6. sensor charts

  7. weekly operation meetings

  8. outside consultants

The specific thing I’m trying to understand:

Is there a real need for a neutral system that turns raw farm data into an evidence-based explanation, such as:

- what changed

- when it changed

- which zone or equipment was involved

- whether the data is trustworthy

- whether the issue is energy, climate, equipment, or operating procedure

- what should be checked next

Not autonomous control.

Not replacing growers.

More like an operational audit layer / evidence pack for farm teams, investors, insurers, lenders, or asset owners.

Questions:

  1. What is the hardest part of diagnosing problems in an indoor farm today?

  2. Who actually cares about this evidence: growers, owners, investors, banks, insurers, government, or OEMs?

  3. Would a farm pay for this, or is this only useful during due diligence / financing / insurance / audits?

  4. What would make such a system useless?

  5. What data is usually available in reality: power, HVAC, humidity, CO2, VPD, yield, labor, crop cycle records?

Brutally honest answers are more useful than encouragement.

reddit.com
u/Admirable_Aside_4824 — 23 days ago