The dismissal of Blake Lively’s claims against Justin Baldoni has confirmed that her ‘Mountain of Evidence’ was nothing more than a confabulated molehill of obfuscation and misdirection.
Reaction’s to Blake Lively’s “Mountain of Evidence” narrative:
————————————————
"Where is the mountain of evidence that Blake and her Scooby doo gang speak of multiple times in interviews?"
"The 'mountain of evidence' is apparently just a collection of cherry-picked texts that the judge eventually threw out."
"The ‘mountain of evidence’ rhetoric was purely to drive the Vanzan subpoenas.”
"Blake Lively supposedly had mountains of evidence, a strong case, and was fighting for women and safer workplaces yet settled. If she's in the stronger legal position, why isn’t she the one with the leverage to refuse settlement?"
"If you have a mountain of evidence, you don't settle for NIL right before the jury is seated. You go for the throat."
"Maybe the NYT should hand over their 'mountains of evidence' to Lively’s lawyers as they haven’t found any themselves."
"Blake kept talking about a 'Mountain of Evidence’, but when it came time for the Great Unsealing, it was more like a ‘Molehill of Hurt Feelings’."
Disclaimer:
This parody photoshop is a legally protected form of expression under First Amendment and relevant fair use doctrines (17 U.S.C. § 107).
All references to individuals real or imaginary are made in the context of satire or political commentary. As defined in U.S. defamation law, public figures are subject to broader scrutiny and commentary, and this content is not intended to be taken as fact.
"Hurt feelings do not give rise to legal claims". Michael Gottlieb, Esra Hudson.
“You can’t sue someone just because your feelings got dinged”. Ryan Reynolds.