Project H just played me.
I’m honestly pretty frustrated with my experience with Project H and wanted to see if anyone else had something similar happen.
I completed the assignment, and right after finishing, I received conflicting status emails almost immediately. One message made it sound like I was removed because of changing project needs, and another said I did not pass.
That already felt strange because the assignment was not just a simple coding test. It had multiple written components and only one short coding component, so I expected some kind of actual review process.
I contacted the assignment platform support, and they told me that completed assessments are reviewed within 1–3 business days, and that mine was still pending review. But Project H support kept replying like the project team had already completed the review and confirmed I failed.
When I asked them to clarify whether they had actually received the final verified result before making the decision, I kept getting generic support style responses saying the decision was final and no retake was available.
That’s the part that bothers me most. I’m not asking for special treatment or a retake. I’m asking whether the decision was based on the finalized result, because the timeline does not add up. If the assignment was still pending review, how was there already a completed project review and rejection?
It feels like the system auto rejected me first, then support just defended the automated outcome without actually checking the process. For something that involved written responses and supposed review standards, that seems pretty unfair.
Has anyone else had this happen with Project H or similar assignment based projects? Did you ever get a real human review, or is the support loop basically just a final decision copy paste?